Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Aug;17(7):723-732.
doi: 10.1177/17474930221107500. Epub 2022 Jun 28.

Treatment of posterior circulation stroke: Acute management and secondary prevention

Affiliations
Review

Treatment of posterior circulation stroke: Acute management and secondary prevention

Hugh S Markus et al. Int J Stroke. 2022 Aug.

Abstract

One-fifth of strokes occur in the territory of the posterior circulation, but their management, particularly acute reperfusion therapy and neurointervention procedures for secondary prevention, has received much less attention than similar interventions for the anterior circulation. In this review, we overview the treatment of posterior circulation stroke, including both interventions in the acute setting and secondary prevention. We focus on areas in which the management of posterior circulation stroke differs from that of stroke in general and highlight recent advances.Effectiveness of acute revascularization of posterior circulation strokes remains in large parts unproven. Thrombolysis seems to have similar benefits and lower hemorrhage risks than in the anterior circulation. The recent ATTENTION and BAOCHE trials have demonstrated that thrombectomy benefits strokes with basilar artery occlusion, but its effect on other posterior occlusion sites remains uncertain. Ischemic and hemorrhagic space-occupying cerebellar strokes can benefit from decompressive craniectomy.Secondary prevention of posterior circulation strokes includes aggressive treatment of cerebrovascular risk factors with both drugs and lifestyle interventions and short-term dual anti-platelet therapy. Randomized controlled trial (RCT) data suggest basilar artery stenosis is better treated with medical therapy than stenting, which has a high peri-procedural risk. Limited data from RCTs in stenting for vertebral stenosis suggest that intracranial stenosis is currently best treated with medical therapy alone; the situation for extracranial stenosis is less clear where stenting for symptomatic stenosis is an option, particularly for recurrent symptoms; larger RCTs are required in this area.

Keywords: Vertebral; acute stroke therapy; basilar; posterior circulation; prevention; stenting; treatment; vertebrobasilar.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of conflicting interests: The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: EIC IJS

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Results of the four large randomized controlled trials of endovascular treatment in patients with acute stroke from basilar artery occlusion., The odds or risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals are shown for a favorable outcome defined as modified Rankin score of 0–3 at 3 months. BEST: Basilar artery occlusion Endovascular intervention versus Standard medical Treatment; BASICS: BASilar artery International Cooperation Study; ATTENTION: EndovAscular TreaTmENT for acute basilar artery occlusION; BAOCHE: Basilar Artery Occlusion CHinese Endovascular trial; OR: odds ratio; RR: risk ratio.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
87-year-old man with acute BAO, NIHSS = 8, randomized to endovascular treatment in the BASICS trial: (a) extensive hypoperfusion (blue color) on mean transit time on perfusion CT from the medullary (A1) to midbrain (A2) levels. Thrombolysis at 130 min. (b) Conventional angiography showing tight stenosis at right vertebral origin (B1: arrow) and basilar artery occlusion (B1, top of image); thrombectomy with basilar artery recanalization at 4.2 h after onset, complicated by a non-stenosing mid-basilar dissection (B2, arrow). (c) Sub-acute diffusion-weighted MRI showing limited stroke volume in the right cerebellum (C1) and no visible lesion in the midbrain (C2). Favorable outcome at 3 months with minimal disability. Copyright Patrik Michel.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
46-year-old man with multilevel posterior circulation stroke and BAO. NIHSS = 8. (a) Diffusion-weighted MRI showing extensive left inferior (A1) and superior (A2) cerebellar infarcts. Basilar artery recanalization by direct thrombectomy 8 h after last proof of good health. (b) Plain CT 5 h later, showing early cerebellar mass effect. (c) Plain CT after decompressive posterior craniectomy of 5 cm diameter, still showing cerebellar mass effect. (d) Plain CT after second craniectomy on day 3 with enlargement of craniectomy diameter to 7 cm and partial resection (arrows) of left inferior(D1) and superior(D2) cerebellar infarcts. Outcome at 3 months, independent, but not working. Copyright Patrik Michel.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Frequent sites of atherosclerotic plaques in the posterior circulation. PCA: posterior cerebral artery. Drawing Alexander Salerno.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Suggested algorithm for prevention of ischemic strokes stratified by the presence of posterior circulation stenosis. Rx: treatment; DSA: digital subtraction angiography; INR: interventional neuroradiologist.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
Recurrence rates for any stroke in a preplanned pooled individual patient data analysis of stenting for symptomatic vertebral artery stenosis: (a) Above, stenting for extracranial stenosis; (b) Below, stenting for intracranial stenosis. Blue: no stenting. Red: with stenting. (reprinted with permission). HR: hazard ratio.

References

    1. Feigin VL, Brainin M, Norrving B, et al. World Stroke Organization (WSO): Global Stroke Fact Sheet 2022. Int J Stroke 2022; 17: 18–29. - PubMed
    1. Salerno A, Strambo D, Nannoni S, Dunet V, Michel P. Patterns of ischemic posterior circulation strokes: a clinical, anatomical, and radiological review [published online ahead of print, 2021 Sep 28]. Int J Stroke 2022. 17: 714–722. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Markus HS, van der Worp HB, Rothwell PM. Posterior circulation ischaemic stroke and transient ischaemic attack: diagnosis, investigation, and secondary prevention. Lancet Neurol 2013; 12: 989–998. - PubMed
    1. Lindley RI, Wardlaw JM, Whiteley WN, et al. Alteplase for acute ischemic stroke: outcomes by clinically important subgroups in the Third International Stroke Trial. Stroke 2015; 46: 746–756. - PubMed
    1. Keselman B, Gdovinová Z, Jatuzis D, et al. Safety and outcomes of intravenous thrombolysis in posterior versus anterior circulation stroke: results from the safe implementation of treatments in stroke registry and meta-analysis. Stroke 2020; 51: 876–882. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms