Parent Perspectives for Type B Ulnar Polydactyly Management
- PMID: 35658690
- PMCID: PMC10617471
- DOI: 10.1177/15589447221096707
Parent Perspectives for Type B Ulnar Polydactyly Management
Abstract
Background: Type B ulnar polydactyly is one of the most commonly encountered congenital hand differences and can be treated with ligation or excision. The purpose of this study was to determine what factors families consider in selecting treatment for their child with type B ulnar polydactyly.
Methods: We reviewed treatment outcomes and administered a survey by telephone to parents of children with type B ulnar polydactyly treated at a pediatric hospital between 2015 and 2020. We assessed satisfaction, reasons for choosing treatment, and post-management complications.
Results: The families of 70 of the 156 consecutive treated patients were successfully contacted and agreed to participate (45% response rate). The mean follow-up was 27 months. Twenty-eight chose in-office suture ligation and 42 chose excision. Rapid treatment was prioritized by those who opted for in-office ligation (P = .044). The complication rate for suture ligation was significantly higher than excision (P < .0001), with the most common complication being a residual remnant (nubbin or neuroma stump) (64%). Respondents with residual remnant reported significantly less satisfaction with the appearance of their child's hand (P < .001) and with treatment outcomes (P = .028) compared to those without residual remnants.
Conclusions: Factors considered by parents in choosing type of treatment for type B ulnar polydactyly vary and may be significantly influenced by the surgeon. Although the majority of parents remain extremely satisfied with their child's outcome regardless of management type, time to treatment plays a determinative role in parents opting for ligation rather than excision in the operating room.
Keywords: anatomy; congential; diagnosis; hand; outcomes; pediatric; research and health outcomes; soft tissue reconstruction; specialty; surgery; trauma.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Figures



References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources