Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jun 6;6(6):CD015397.
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015397.

Unintended consequences of measures implemented in the school setting to contain the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review

Affiliations

Unintended consequences of measures implemented in the school setting to contain the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review

Suzie Kratzer et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. .

Update in

Abstract

Background: With the emergence of SARS-CoV-2 in late 2019, governments worldwide implemented a multitude of non-pharmaceutical interventions in order to control the spread of the virus. Most countries have implemented measures within the school setting in order to reopen schools or keep them open whilst aiming to contain the spread of SARS-CoV-2. For informed decision-making on implementation, adaptation, or suspension of such measures, it is not only crucial to evaluate their effectiveness with regard to SARS-CoV-2 transmission, but also to assess their unintended consequences.

Objectives: To comprehensively identify and map the evidence on the unintended health and societal consequences of school-based measures to prevent and control the spread of SARS-CoV-2. We aimed to generate a descriptive overview of the range of unintended (beneficial or harmful) consequences reported as well as the study designs that were employed to assess these outcomes. This review was designed to complement an existing Cochrane Review on the effectiveness of these measures by synthesising evidence on the implications of the broader system-level implications of school measures beyond their effects on SARS-CoV-2 transmission.

Search methods: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, four non-health databases, and two COVID-19 reference collections on 26 March 2021, together with reference checking, citation searching, and Google searches.

Selection criteria: We included quantitative (including mathematical modelling), qualitative, and mixed-methods studies of any design that provided evidence on any unintended consequences of measures implemented in the school setting to contain the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Studies had to report on at least one unintended consequence, whether beneficial or harmful, of one or more relevant measures, as conceptualised in a logic model. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We screened the titles/abstracts and subsequently full texts in duplicate, with any discrepancies between review authors resolved through discussion. One review author extracted data for all included studies, with a second review author reviewing the data extraction for accuracy. The evidence was summarised narratively and graphically across four prespecified intervention categories and six prespecified categories of unintended consequences; findings were described as deriving from quantitative, qualitative, or mixed-method studies.

Main results: Eighteen studies met our inclusion criteria. Of these, 13 used quantitative methods (3 experimental/quasi-experimental; 5 observational; 5 modelling); four used qualitative methods; and one used mixed methods. Studies looked at effects in different population groups, mainly in children and teachers. The identified interventions were assigned to four broad categories: 14 studies assessed measures to make contacts safer; four studies looked at measures to reduce contacts; six studies assessed surveillance and response measures; and one study examined multiple measures combined. Studies addressed a wide range of unintended consequences, most of them considered harmful. Eleven studies investigated educational consequences. Seven studies reported on psychosocial outcomes. Three studies each provided information on physical health and health behaviour outcomes beyond COVID-19 and environmental consequences. Two studies reported on socio-economic consequences, and no studies reported on equity and equality consequences.

Authors' conclusions: We identified a heterogeneous evidence base on unintended consequences of measures implemented in the school setting to prevent and control the spread of SARS-CoV-2, and summarised the available study data narratively and graphically. Primary research better focused on specific measures and various unintended outcomes is needed to fill knowledge gaps and give a broader picture of the diverse unintended consequences of school-based measures before a more thorough evidence synthesis is warranted. The most notable lack of evidence we found was regarding psychosocial, equity, and equality outcomes. We also found a lack of research on interventions that aim to reduce the opportunity for contacts. Additionally, study investigators should provide sufficient data on contextual factors and demographics in order to ensure analyses of such are feasible, thus assisting stakeholders in making appropriate, informed decisions for their specific circumstances.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

SK: Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung ‐ grant (covid‐evidenz.de/); part of the scientific secretariat that supports the development of a living interdisciplinary, evidence‐based and consensus‐based guideline on measures to prevent and control SARS‐CoV‐2 transmission in schools, recently registered with the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies (AWMF) in Germany (www.awmf.org/en/clinical‐practice‐guidelines/detail/anmeldung/1/ll/027‐076.html).

LP: German Federal Ministry of Education and Research ‐ grant (covid‐evidenz.de/); part of the scientific secretariat that supports the development of a living interdisciplinary, evidence‐based and consensus‐based guideline on measures to prevent and control SARS‐CoV‐2 transmission in schools, recently registered with the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies (AWMF) in Germany (www.awmf.org/en/clinical‐practice‐guidelines/detail/anmeldung/1/ll/027‐076.html); a co‐author on the Cochrane Review 'Measures implemented in the school setting to contain the COVID‐19 pandemic'.

RB: no relevant interests; part of the scientific secretariat that supports the development of a living interdisciplinary, evidence‐based and consensus‐based guideline on measures to prevent and control SARS‐CoV‐2 transmission in schools, recently registered with the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies (AWMF) in Germany (www.awmf.org/en/clinical‐practice‐guidelines/detail/anmeldung/1/ll/027‐076.html).

RF: no relevant interests; member of the Cochrane Central Editorial Service team.

CK: German Federal Ministry of Education and Research ‐ grant (covid‐evidenz.de/); part of the scientific secretariat that supports the development of a living interdisciplinary, evidence‐based and consensus‐based guideline on measures to prevent and control SARS‐CoV‐2 transmission in schools, recently registered with the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies (AWMF) in Germany (www.awmf.org/en/clinical‐practice‐guidelines/detail/anmeldung/1/ll/027‐076.html).

AM: German Federal Ministry of Education and Research ‐ grant (covid‐evidenz.de/).

JR: Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung ‐ grant (covid‐evidenz.de/); part of the scientific secretariat that supports the development of a living interdisciplinary, evidence‐based and consensus‐based guideline on measures to prevent and control SARS‐CoV‐2 transmission in schools, recently registered with the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies (AWMF) in Germany (www.awmf.org/en/clinical‐practice‐guidelines/detail/anmeldung/1/ll/027‐076.html).

JS: Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung ‐ grant (covid‐evidenz.de/).

ER: Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung ‐ grant (covid‐evidenz.de/); part of the scientific secretariat that supports the development of a living interdisciplinary, evidence‐based and consensus‐based guideline on measures to prevent and control SARS‐CoV‐2 transmission in schools, registered with the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies (AWMF) in Germany (www.awmf.org/en/clinical‐practice‐guidelines/detail/anmeldung/1/ll/027‐076.html); member of the scientific advisory board of the Robert Koch Institute, which has issued guidance on schooling during COVID‐19, but has not been involved in the development of this guidance; member of the World Health Organization (WHO) Regional Office for Europe's Technical Advisory Group on Schooling during COVID‐19 and involved in advising the WHO Regional Office for Europe on this issue.

KW: German Federal Ministry for Education and Research ‐ grant (covid‐evidenz.de/); part of the scientific secretariat that supports the development of a living interdisciplinary, evidence‐based and consensus‐based guideline on measures to prevent and control SARS‐CoV‐2 transmission in schools, recently registered with the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies (AWMF) in Germany (www.awmf.org/en/clinical‐practice‐guidelines/detail/anmeldung/1/ll/027‐076.html).

BV: German Federal Ministry of Education and Research ‐ grant (covid‐evidenz.de); part of the scientific secretariat that supports the development of a living interdisciplinary, evidence‐based and consensus‐based guideline on measures to prevent and control SARS‐CoV‐2 transmission in schools, recently registered with the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies (AWMF) in Germany (www.awmf.org/en/clinical‐practice‐guidelines/detail/anmeldung/1/ll/027‐076.html).

Figures

1
1
Figure 1: Logic model of school‐based measures to prevent and control the spread of SARS‐CoV‐2 and their unintended consequences. The logic model follows the PIO (population, intervention, outcomes) scheme. This logic model is based on the previously developed logic model for a Cochrane scoping review, Krishnaratne 2020, and a Cochrane Review on the effectiveness of school‐based measures (Krishnaratne 2022).
2
2
PRISMA flow diagram.
3
3
Evidence map of unintended consequences of school‐based measures to prevent SARS‐CoV‐2. Each square represents the case in which a single included study evaluated a type of school measure (rows) against an unintended consequences category (columns); additionally, the study type is provided (colour).

References

References to studies included in this review

Alonso 2021 {published data only}
    1. Alonso A, Llanos J, Escandón R, Sendra JJ.Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on indoor air quality and thermal comfort of primary schools in winter in a Mediterranean climate. Sustainability 2021;13(5):2699.
Borch 2020 {published data only}
    1. Borch L, Thorsteinsson K, Warner TC, Mikkelsen CS, Bjerring P, Lundbye-Christensen S, et al.COVID-19 reopening causes high risk of irritant contact dermatitis in children. Danish Medical Journal 2020;67(9):A05200357. - PubMed
Cohen 2020 {published data only}
    1. Cohen JA, Mistry D, Kerr CC, Klein DJ.Schools are not islands: balancing COVID-19 risk and educational benefits using structural and temporal countermeasures. medRxiv 2020. [DOI: 10.1101/2020.09.08.20190942] - DOI
Curtius 2021 {published data only}
    1. Curtius J, Granzin M, Schrod J.Testing mobile air purifiers in a school classroom: reducing the airborne transmission risk for SARS-CoV-2. Aerosol Science and Technology 2021;55(5):586-99.
Doron 2021 {published data only}
    1. Doron S, Ingalls RR, Beauchamp A, Boehm J, Boucher HW, Chow LH, et al.Weekly SARS-CoV-2 screening of asymptomatic students and staff to guide and evaluate strategies for safer in-person learning. medRxiv 2021. [DOI: 10.1101/2021.03.20.21253976] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Fontenelle‐Tereshchuk 2021 {published data only}
    1. Fontenelle-Tereshchuk D.Mental health and the COVID-19 crisis: the hopes and concerns for children as schools re-open. Interchange 2021;52(1):1-16. - PMC - PubMed
Gill 2020a {published data only}
    1. Gill B, Goyal R, Hartog J, Hotchkiss J, DeLisle D.Considerations for reopening Pennsylvania schools. eric.ed.gov/?id=ED605937 (accessed prior to 10 May 2022).
Gill 2020b {published data only}
    1. Gill BP, Goyal R, Hotchkiss J.Operating schools in a pandemic: predicted effects of opening, quarantining, and closing strategies. eric.ed.gov/?id=ED611274 (accessed prior to 10 May 2022).
Hortigüela‐Alcalá 2021 {published data only}
    1. Hortigüela-Alcalá D, Hernando-Garijo A, Pérez-Pueyo Á.Physical education in the COVID-19 context. A tale from teachers of different educational stages. Retos 2021;41:764-74.
Li 2021 {published data only}
    1. Li Q, Tarimo CS, Miao Y, Zeng X, Wu C, Wu J.Effects of mask wearing on anxiety of teachers affected by COVID-19: a large cross-sectional study in China. Journal of Affective Disorders 2021;281:574-80. - PMC - PubMed
Lorenc 2021 {published data only}
    1. Lorenc A, Kesten JM, Kidger J, Langford R, Horwood J.Reducing COVID-19 risk in schools: a qualitative examination of secondary school staff and family views and concerns in the South West of England. BMJ Paediatrics Open 2021;5(1):e000987. - PMC - PubMed
Marchant 2020 {published data only}
    1. Marchant E, Todd C, James M, Crick T, Dwyer R, Brophy S.Primary school staff reflections on school closures due to COVID-19 and recommendations for the future: a national qualitative survey. medRxiv 2020. [DOI: 10.1101/2020.11.06.20227108] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Phillips 2021 {published data only}
    1. Phillips B, Browne DT, Anand M, Bauch CT.Model-based projections for COVID-19 outbreak size and student-days lost to closure in Ontario childcare centres and primary schools. Scientific Reports 2021;11(1):6402. - PMC - PubMed
Ruba 2020 {published data only}
    1. Ruba AL, Pollak SD.Children's emotion inferences from masked faces: implications for social interactions during COVID-19. PLOS ONE 2020;15(12):e0243708. - PMC - PubMed
Saad 2020 {published data only}
    1. Saad AA, Saad M, Boctor EM.COVID-19 Active Surveillance Simulation Case Study - health and economic impacts of active surveillance in a school environment. medRxiv 2020. [DOI: 10.1101/2020.10.28.20221416] - DOI
Schwarz 2021 {published data only}
    1. Schwarz S, Jenetzky E, Krafft H, Maurer T, Martin D.Corona child studies "Co-Ki": first results of a Germany-wide register on mouth and nose covering (mask) in children [Coronakinderstudien "Co-Ki“: erste Ergebnisse eines deutschlandweiten Registers zur Mund-Nasen-Bedeckung (Maske) bei Kindern]. Monatsschrift Kinderheilkunde 2021;169(4):353-65. - PMC - PubMed
Simonsen 2020 {published data only}
    1. Simonsen AB, Ruge IF, Quaade AS, Johansen JD, Thyssen JP, Zachariae C.High incidence of hand eczema in Danish schoolchildren following intensive hand hygiene during the COVID-19 pandemic: a nationwide questionnaire study. British Journal of Dermatology 2020;183(5):975-6. - PMC - PubMed
Steffens 2021 {published data only}
    1. Steffens T, Seipp HM.Lufthygiene in Unterrichtsräumen unter SARS-CoV-2-Bedingungen. Teil I: Auswirkungen der Schallbelastung beim Einsatz mobiler Luftreiniger (MLR). Gefahrstoffe 2021;81:127-34.

References to studies excluded from this review

Álvarez 2020 {published data only}
    1. Álvarez M, Gardyn N, Iardelevsky A, Rebello G.Segregación educativa en tiempos de pandemia: balance de las acciones iniciales durante el aislamiento social por el Covid-19 en Argentina. Revista Internacional de Educación para la Justicia Social 2020;9(3):25-43.
Campbell 2020 {published data only}
    1. Campbell JR, Uppal A, Oxlade O, Fregonese F, Bastos ML, Lan Z, et al.Active testing of groups at increased risk of acquiring SARS-CoV-2 in Canada: costs and human resource needs. CMAJ 2020;192(40):E1146-55. - PMC - PubMed
Fathian‐Dastgerdi 2021 {published data only}
    1. Fathian-Dastgerdi Z, Khoshgoftar M, Tavakoli B, Jaleh M.Factors associated with preventive behaviors of COVID-19 among adolescents: applying the health belief model. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy 2021;17(10):1786-90. - PMC - PubMed
Fioretti 2020 {published data only}
    1. Fioretti C, Palladino BE, Nocentini A, Menesini E.Positive and negative experiences of living in COVID-19 pandemic: analysis of Italian adolescents' narratives. Frontiers in Psychology 2020;11:599531. - PMC - PubMed
Gilbert 2020 {published data only}
    1. Gilbert LK, Strine TW, Szucs LE, Crawford TN, Parks SE, Barradas DT, et al.Racial and ethnic differences in parental attitudes and concerns about school reopening during the COVID-19 pandemic - United States, July 2020. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 2020;69(49):1848-52. [DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6949a2] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Kähler 2020 {published data only}
    1. Kähler J, Fuchs T, Mutsch B, Hain R.School education during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic - which concept is safe, feasible and environmentally sound? medRxiv 2020. [DOI: 10.1101/2020.10.12.20211219] - DOI
Landeros 2021 {published data only}
    1. Landeros A, Ji X, Lange K, Stutz TC, Xu J, Sehl ME, et al.An examination of school reopening strategies during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. medRxiv 2020. [DOI: 10.1101/2020.08.05.20169086] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Pressley 2021 {published data only}
    1. Pressley T.Factors contributing to teacher burnout during COVID-19. Educational Researcher 2021;50(5):325-7.
Tobia 2020 {published data only}
    1. Tobia V, Sacchi S, Cerina V, Manca S, Fornara F.The influence of classroom seating arrangement on children's cognitive processes in primary school: the role of individual variables. Current Psychology 2020 Oct 31 [Epub ahead of print]. [DOI: 10.1007/s12144-020-01154-9] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Vu 2020 {published data only}
    1. Vu C-T, Hoang A-D, Than V-Q, Nguyen M-T, Dinh V-H, Thi Le Q-A, et al.Dataset of Vietnamese teachers' perspectives and perceived support during the COVID-19 pandemic. Data in Brief 2020;31:105788. - PMC - PubMed

Additional references

Arksey 2005
    1. Arksey H, O'Malley L.Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 2005;8(1):19–32.
Bonell 2015
    1. Bonell C, Jamal F, Melendez-Torres GJ, Cummins S.'Dark logic': theorising the harmful consequences of public health interventions. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 2015;69(1):95-8. - PubMed
Bonell 2020
    1. Bonell C, Melendez-Torres GJ, Viner RM, Rogers MB, Whitworth M, Rutter H, et al.An evidence-based theory of change for reducing SARS-CoV-2 transmission in reopened schools. Health & Place 2020;64:102398. - PMC - PubMed
Couzin‐Frankel 2020
    1. Couzin-Frankel J, Vogel G.School openings across globe suggest ways to keep coronavirus at bay, despite outbreaks. www.science.org/content/article/school-openings-across-globe-suggest-way... (accessed prior to 10 May 2022). [DOI: 10.1126/science.abd7107] - DOI
Dibner 2020
    1. Dibner KA, Schweingruber HA, Christakis DA.Reopening K-12 schools during the COVID-19 pandemic: a Report from the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. JAMA 2020;324(9):833-4. - PubMed
EndNote [Computer program]
    1. EndNote.The EndNote Team, Version X9. Philadelphia, PA: Clarivate, 2013.
Fong 2020
    1. Fong VC, Iarocci G.Child and family outcomes following pandemics: a systematic review and recommendations on COVID-19 policies. Journal of Pediatric Psychology 2020;45(10):1124-43. - PMC - PubMed
Imran 2020
    1. Imran N, Aamer I, Sharif MI, Bodla ZH, Naveed S.Psychological burden of quarantine in children and adolescents: a rapid systematic review and proposed solutions. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences 2020;36(5):1106-16. - PMC - PubMed
Lockwood 2019
    1. Lockwood C, Dos Santos KB, Pap R.Practical guidance for knowledge synthesis: scoping review methods. Asian Nursing Research 2019;13(5):287-94. - PubMed
Merton 1936
    1. Merton RK.The unanticipated consequences of purposive social action. American Sociological Review 1936;1(6):894–904.
Ouzzani 2016
    1. Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, Elmagarmid A.Rayyan - a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews 2016;5(1):210. - PMC - PubMed
Palayew 2020
    1. Palayew A, Norgaard O, Safreed-Harmon K, Andersen TH, Rasmussen LN, Lazarus JV.Pandemic publishing poses a new COVID-19 challenge. Nature Human Behaviour 2020;4(7):666-9. - PubMed
Panda 2021
    1. Panda PK, Gupta J, Chowdhury SR, Kumar R, Meena AK, Madaan P, et al.Psychological and behavioral impact of lockdown and quarantine measures for COVID-19 pandemic on children, adolescents and caregivers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Tropical Pediatrics 2021;67(1):fmaa122. - PMC - PubMed
Peters 2020
    1. Peters MDJ, Godfrey C, McInerney P, Munn Z, Tricco AC, Khalil H.Chapter 11: Scoping Reviews (2020 version). In: Aromataris E, Munn Z, editors(s). JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. Available from synthesismanual.jbi.global. JBI, 2020. [DOI: 10.46658/JBIMES-20-12] - DOI
Rehfuess 2019
    1. Rehfuess EA, Stratil JM, Scheel IB, Portela A, Norris SL, Baltussen R.The WHO-INTEGRATE evidence to decision framework version 1.0: integrating WHO norms and values and a complexity perspective. BMJ Global Health 2019;4(Suppl 1):e000844. - PMC - PubMed
RKI 2021
    1. Robert Koch-Institut.Epidemiologischer Steckbrief zu SARS-CoV-2 und COVID-19. www.rki.de/DE/Content/InfAZ/N/Neuartiges_Coronavirus/Steckbrief.html;jse... (accessed prior to 10 May 2022).
Tricco 2018
    1. Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O'Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, et al.PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine 2018;169(7):467-73. - PubMed
Turcotte‐Tremblay 2021
    1. Turcotte-Tremblay AM, Gali Gali IA, Ridde V.The unintended consequences of COVID-19 mitigation measures matter: practical guidance for investigating them. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2021;21(1):28. - PMC - PubMed
UNESCO 2020
    1. UNESCO.Education: from disruption to recovery. en.unesco.org/covid19/educationresponse (accessed prior to 10 May 2022).
Viner 2021a
    1. Viner RM, Mytton OT, Bonell C, Melendez-Torres GJ, Ward J, Hudson L, et al.Susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection among children and adolescents compared with adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatrics 2021;175(2):143-56. - PMC - PubMed
Viner 2021b
    1. Viner R, Russell S, Saulle R, Croker H, Stansfeld C, Packer J, et al.Impacts of school closures on physical and mental health of children and young people: a systematic review. medRxiv 2021. [DOI: 10.1101/2021.02.10.21251526] - DOI
Walsh 2021
    1. Walsh S, Chowdhury A, Braithwaite V, Russell S, Birch J, Ward J, et al.Do school closures and school reopenings affect community transmission of COVID-19? A systematic review of observational studies. BMJ Open 2021;11:e053371. [DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053371] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
WHO 2020a
    1. World Health Organization.WHO Director-General's opening remarks at the media briefing on COVID-19 - 11 March 2020. www.who.int/director-general/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-open....
WHO 2020b
    1. World Health Organization.Overview of public health and social measures in the context of COVID-19: interim guidance, 18 May 2020. apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/332115 (accessed prior to 10 May 2022).

References to other published versions of this review

Krishnaratne 2020
    1. Krishnaratne S, Pfadenhauer LM, Coenen M, Geffert K, Jung-Sievers C, Klinger C, et al.Measures implemented in the school setting to contain the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2020, Issue 12. Art. No: CD013812. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013812] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Krishnaratne 2022
    1. Krishnaratne S, Littlecott H, Sell K, Burns J, Rabe JE, Stratil JM, et al.Measures implemented in the school setting to contain the COVID-19 pandemic: a rapid review. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2022 [submitted].

Publication types