Obstetric anesthesia: pearls and pitfalls in anesthesia for cesarean delivery
- PMID: 35662608
- PMCID: PMC9373631
- DOI: 10.1016/j.bjane.2022.05.006
Obstetric anesthesia: pearls and pitfalls in anesthesia for cesarean delivery
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of interest The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
-
- Roofthooft E, Joshi GP, Rawal N, et al. PROSPECT Working Group* of the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy and supported by the Obstetric Anaesthetists’ Association PROSPECT guideline for elective caesarean section: updated systematic review and procedure-specific postoperative pain management recommendations. Anaesthesia. 2021;76:665–680. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Nair V, Henry R. Bilateral paravertebral block: a satisfactory alternative for labour analgesia. Can J Anaesth. 2001;48:179–184. - PubMed
-
- Champaneria R, Shah L, Wilson MJ, et al. Clinical effectiveness of transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks for pain relief after caesarean section: a meta-analysis. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2016;28:45–60. - PubMed
-
- Kainu JP, Sarvela J, Halonen P, et al. Continuous wound infusion with ropivacaine fails to provide adequate analgesia after caesarean section. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2012;21:119–124. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
