Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jun;22(3):387-402.
doi: 10.1177/1468794120985691.

Looking at the 'field' through a Zoom lens: Methodological reflections on conducting online research during a global pandemic

Marnie Howlett  1
Affiliations

Looking at the 'field' through a Zoom lens: Methodological reflections on conducting online research during a global pandemic

Marnie Howlett. Qual Res. 2022 Jun.

Abstract

For many social science scholars, the COVID-19 pandemic has forced us to re-think our approaches to research. As a result of new social distancing measures, those of us who conduct in-person qualitative and ethnographic research have faced significant challenges in accessing the populations and fields we study. Technology served as an incredibly useful tool for social interaction and research prior to the pandemic, and it has since become even more important as a way to engage with others. Although not all types of social research, or even all projects, lend themselves to online activities, digital communication platforms like Zoom, Skype, and Facebook have allowed many of us to continue our studies from a distance-in some cases, significant temporal and spatial distances away from our research sites. As such, it is important to consider how these different methodological approaches challenge our understandings of fieldwork. While the disadvantages of not physically accessing the places we study are clear, can mediated approaches offer (any) hope of the immersion we experienced with in-person fieldwork? If many of us are able to continue ethnographic research (in some form) without co-locating with our participants in our field sites, how are our studies fundamentally affected, as well as the ways we conceptualize the 'field' more largely? This paper explores these methodological and epistemological questions through reflections on conducting online research during the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Keywords: Methodology; field research; online methods; pandemic; qualitative research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of conflicting interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

References

    1. Abidin C, De Seta G. (2020) Private messages from the field: confessions on digital ethnography and its discomforts. Journal of Digital Social Research 2(1): 1–19.
    1. Ahlin T, Li F. (2019) From field sites to field events: creating the field with information communication technologies (ICTs). Medicine Anthropology Theory 6(2): 1–24.
    1. Beaulieu A. (2004) Mediating ethnography: objectivity and the making of ethnographies of the Internet. Social Epistemology 18(2–3): 139–163.
    1. Beaulieu A. (2010) From co-location to co-presence: shifts in the use of ethnography for the study of knowledge. Social Studies of Science 40(3): 453–470.
    1. Bargh J, McKenna K, Fitzsimons G. (2002) Can you see the real me? Activation and expression of the ‘true self’ on the Internet. Journal of Social Issues 58(1): 33–48.