Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Apr;66(4):255-259.
doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_783_21. Epub 2022 Apr 20.

Ultrasound-guided estimation of gastric residual volume using Perlas's formula: A validation study in patients

Sayali S Khandekar  1 , Jeson R Doctor  1 , Shilpa K Awaskar  1 , Nidhin K Alex  1 , Lipika R Medha  1 , Priya Ranganathan  1
Affiliations

Ultrasound-guided estimation of gastric residual volume using Perlas's formula: A validation study in patients

Sayali S Khandekar et al. Indian J Anaesth. 2022 Apr.

Abstract

Background and aims: Bedside ultrasound (US) is used to evaluate gastric residual volume (GRV) and assess aspiration risk. We examined the accuracy of US-guided measurement of GRV using Perlas's formula, by two trained anaesthesiologists, in patients who had consumed different types and volumes of fluids.

Methods: Patients with no risk factors for delayed gastric emptying were included. Each assessor independently determined the baseline US-guided GRV. The patients were randomly allocated to receive no drink or 100 or 200 mL of water or milk. US-guided GRV was re-assessed within 5 min after the intervention. Investigators were blinded to the measurements performed by each other and to the randomisation arm. The primary outcome was the agreement between actual volumes consumed and estimated change in GRV.

Results: Agreement between actual volume consumed and estimated change in GRV was poor [Intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) 0.46, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.09 to 0.72; P = 0.09 for assessor 1 and ICC 0.37; 95% CI 0.02 to 0.66; P = 0.03 for assessor 2].

Conclusion: US-guided GRV measurements using Perlas's formula, performed by trained anaesthesiologists may not be a reliable measure of GRV.

Keywords: Gastric emptying; pyloric antrum; stomach content; ultrasonography.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study schema. GRV: Gastric residual volume
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Bouvet L, Mazoit JX, Chassard D, Allaouchiche B, Boselli E, Benhamou D. Clinical assessment of the ultrasonographic measurement of antral area for estimating preoperative gastric content and volume. Anaesthesiology. 2011;114:1086–92. - PubMed
    1. Perlas A, Chan VW, Lupu CM, Mitsakakis N, Hanbidge A. Ultrasound assessment of gastric content and volume. Anaesthesiology. 2009;111:82–9. - PubMed
    1. Doctor JR, Chandan P, Shetty N, Gala K, Ranganathan P. Ultrasound-guided assessment of gastric residual volume in patients receiving three types of clear fluids:A randomised blinded study. Indian J Anaesth. 2021;65:289–94. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arzola C, Carvalho JC, Cubillos J, Ye XY, Perlas A. Anesthesiologists'learning curves for bedside qualitative ultrasound assessment of gastric content:A cohort study. Can J Anaesth. 2013;60:771–9. - PubMed
    1. Perlas A, Mitsakakis N, Liu L, Cino M, Haldipur N, Davis L, et al. Validation of a mathematical model for ultrasound assessment of gastric volume by gastroscopic examination. Anesth Analg. 2013;116:357–63. - PubMed