Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May 18:4:898950.
doi: 10.3389/fgeed.2022.898950. eCollection 2022.

Enabling Genome Editing for Enhanced Agricultural Sustainability

Affiliations

Enabling Genome Editing for Enhanced Agricultural Sustainability

Felicity Keiper et al. Front Genome Ed. .

Abstract

Agricultural sustainability encompasses environmental, social, and economic aspects, all of which are continually shifting due changing environmental pressures and societal expectations. A range of strategies are required to address these challenges, and these include the use of innovation and adoption of the best available practices and technologies. Advances in biotechnologies, including genome editing, and their application in plant breeding and research are expected to provide a range of benefits that contribute to all aspects of agricultural sustainability. However, adoption of these technologies needs to be supported by proportionate, coherent, forward-looking, and adaptable policies and regulatory approaches. In this Perspective, we reflect on the regulatory challenges associated with commercialising a transgenic crop, and developments thus far in providing regulatory clarity for genome edited crops. We aim to demonstrate that much remains to be done to shift towards a more proportionate and enabling approach before the potential benefits of genome edited crops can be realised. The implications of precautionary and disproportionate regulation are also discussed.

Keywords: agricultural sustainability; biotech crops; biotech regulation; crop improvement; genome editing; plant breeding.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors are employed by BASF, a global research and development company with a diverse range of chemistry-based business segments, and an agricultural business that includes biotech seed products.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
World map showing the top five producers of transgenic crops and their major trading partners, compiled by CropLife International based on 2018 data (source: https://croplife.org/news/global-agriculture-a-trade-map/). More information for each of the top five countries is available at the CropLife International website. Approval was obtained from CropLife International to use the image in Figure 1.

References

    1. Abdallah N. A., Hamwieh A., Radwan K., Fouad N., Prakash C. (2021). Genome Editing Techniques in Plants: a Comprehensive Review and Future Prospects toward Zero Hunger. GM Crops Food 12 (2), 601–615. 10.1080/21645698.2021.2021724 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Allen P., Van Dusen D., Lundy J., Gliessman S. (2009). Integrating Social, Environmental, and Economic Issues in Sustainable Agriculture. Am. J. Alt. Ag. 6 (1), 34–39. 10.1017/s0889189300003787 - DOI
    1. Atanassova A., Keiper F. (2018). Plant Breeding Innovation: A Global Regulatory Perspective. Cereal Chem. 95, 8–16. 10.1002/cche.10021 - DOI
    1. Barrows G., Sexton S., Zilberman D. (2014). The Impact of Agricultural Biotechnology on Supply and Land-Use. Envir. Dev. Econ. 19 (6), 676–703. 10.1017/S1355770X14000400 - DOI
    1. Bock A. K., Krzysztofowicz M., Rudkin J., Winthagen V. (2020). Farmers of the Future. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. 10.2760/680650 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources