Sociodemographic determinants of prepregnancy body mass index and gestational weight gain: The Mutaba'ah study
- PMID: 35664246
- PMCID: PMC9159565
- DOI: 10.1002/osp4.573
Sociodemographic determinants of prepregnancy body mass index and gestational weight gain: The Mutaba'ah study
Abstract
Objective: This study examined the associations of sociodemographic and lifestyle factors with prepregnancy body mass index (BMI) and gestational weight gain (GWG).
Methods: In the Mutaba'ah Study in the United Arab Emirates, repeated measurements throughout pregnancy from medical records were used to determine prepregnancy BMI and GWG. Associations of sociodemographic and lifestyle factors with prepregnancy BMI and GWG (separately by normal weight, overweight, and obesity status) were tested using multivariable regression models, adjusted for maternal age at delivery.
Results: Among 3536 pregnant participants, more than half had prepregnancy overweight (33.2%) or obesity (26.9%), and nearly three-quarters had inadequate (34.2%) or excessive (38.2%) GWG. Higher parity (β for 1-2 to ≥5 children = 0.94 to 1.73 kg/m2), lower maternal education (β for tertiary = -1.42), infertility treatment (β = 0.69), and maternal prepregnancy active smoking (β = 1.95) were independently associated with higher prepregnancy BMI. Higher parity was associated with a lower risk for excessive GWG among women with prepregnancy normal weight (odds ratios (ORs) for 1-2 to ≥5 children = 0.61 to 0.39). Higher maternal education was negatively associated with inadequate GWG among women with normal weight and overweight (ORs for tertiary education = 0.75 and 0.69, respectively).
Conclusions: Sociodemographic factors, especially parity and maternal education, were differentially associated with prepregnancy BMI and GWG adequacy across weight status.
Keywords: gestational weight gain; maternal education; parity; prepregnancy body mass index; sociodemographics.
© 2021 The Authors. Obesity Science & Practice published by World Obesity and The Obesity Society and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declared no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results. TSC's work is partially supported by the UK Medical Research Council (MC_UU_00006/2).
Figures
References
-
- Institute of Medicine and , National Research Council Committee to Reexamine IOMPWG . The national Academies collection: Reports funded by National Institutes of Health. In: Rasmussen KM, Yaktine AL, eds. Weight Gain During Pregnancy: Reexamining the Guidelines. National Academies Press (US) Copyright © 2009, National Academy of Sciences; 2009. - PubMed
-
- Santos S, Voerman E, Amiano P, et al. Impact of maternal body mass index and gestational weight gain on pregnancy complications: an individual participant data meta‐analysis of European, North American and Australian cohorts. BJOG An Int J Obstetrics Gynaecol. 2019;126(8):984‐995. 10.1111/1471-0528.15661 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Najafi F, Hasani J, Izadi N, et al. The effect of prepregnancy body mass index on the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and dose‐response meta‐analysis. Obes Rev. 2019;20(3):472‐486. - PubMed
-
- Goldstein RF, Abell SK, Ranasinha S, et al. Association of gestational weight gain with maternal and infant outcomes: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. JAMA. 2017;317(21):2207‐2225. Epub 2017/06/07. PubMed PMID: 28586887; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC5815056 Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Dr Boyle reported serving on the Women’s Health Global Advisory Board for Pfizer. No other disclosures were reported. 10.1001/jama.2017.3635 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources