Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May 18:9:911053.
doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.911053. eCollection 2022.

Right Ventricular Dysfunction Predicts Outcome in Acute Heart Failure

Affiliations

Right Ventricular Dysfunction Predicts Outcome in Acute Heart Failure

Max Berrill et al. Front Cardiovasc Med. .

Abstract

Aim: The severity of cardiac impairment in acute heart failure (AHF) predicts outcome, but challenges remain to identify prognostically important non-invasive parameters of cardiac function. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is relevant, but only in those with reduced LV systolic function. We aimed to assess the standard and advanced parameters of left and right ventricular (RV) function from echocardiography in predicting long-term outcomes in AHF.

Methods: A total of 418 consecutive AHF patients presenting over 12 months were prospectively recruited and underwent bedside echocardiography within 24 h of recruitment. We retrospectively assessed 8 RV and 5 LV echo parameters of the cardiac systolic function to predict 2-year mortality, using both guideline-directed and study-specific cutoffs, based on the maximum Youden indices via ROC analysis. For the RV, these were the tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, RV fractional area change, tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) peak tricuspid annular systolic wave velocity, both peak- and end-systolic RV free wall global longitudinal strain (RV GLS) and strain rate (mean RV GLSR), RV ejection fraction (RVEF) derived from a 2D ellipsoid model and the ratio of the TAPSE to systolic pulmonary artery pressure (SPAP). For the LV, these were the LVEF, mitral regurgitant ΔP/Δt (MR dP/dt), the lateral mitral annular TDI peak systolic wave velocity, LV GLS, and the LV GLSR.

Results: A total of 7/8 parameters of RV systolic function were predictive of 2-year outcome, with study cutoffs like international guidelines. A cutoff of < -1.8 s-1 mean RV GLSR was associated with worse outcome compared to > -1.8 s-1 [HR 2.13 95% CI 1.33-3.40 (p = 0.002)]. TAPSE:SPAP of > 0.027 cm/mmHg (vs. < 0.027 cm/mmHg) predicted worse outcome [HR 2.12 95% CI 1.53-2.92 (p < 0.001)]. A 3-way comparison of 2-year mortality by LVEF from the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guideline criteria of LVEF > 50, 41-49, and < 40% was not prognostic [38.6% vs. 30.9 vs. 43.9% (p = 0.10)]. Of the 5 parameters of LV systolic function, only an MR dP/dt cutoff of < 570 mmHg was predictive of adverse outcome [HR 1.63 95% CI 1.01-2.62 (p = 0.047)].

Conclusion: With cutoffs broadly like the ESC guidelines, we identified RV dysfunction to be associated with adverse prognosis, whereas LVEF could not identify patients at risk.

Keywords: RV dysfunction; RV failure; acute heart failure; ejection fraction; strain; strain rate.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Kaplan–Meier estimates 3 guideline-suggested cutoffs of the most used systolic assessments of both the right and left ventricles. From left to right, TAPSE (cutoff 1.7 cm) (p-value = 0.0051), RV FAC (cutoff 35%) (p-value = 0.049), and LVEF (cutoffs for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (LVEF > 50%), heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction (LVEF 41–49%) and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (LVEF < 40%) (p-value = 0.109).
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Unadjusted Kaplan–Meier curves comparing 8 different assessments of RV systolic function, in all. The green lines represent the unimpaired systolic function and blue lines represent impaired systolic function. The echo parameter assessment of systolic function is displayed in the top-right corner of each (clockwise from top-left): TAPSE ≤ 1.6 cm, RV FAC ≥ 38.2%, 2D ellipsoid RVEF < 46.9%, TAPSE:SPAP < 0.0268 (cm/mmHg). RV S’ ≤ 0.09 m/s, Peak systolic RV GLS > −18.6%, End-systole RV GLS > −18% and RV mean GLSR > −1.8 s TAPSE, Tricuspid Annular Plane Systolic Excursion; RV FAC, RV Fractional Area Change; RV S’ RV Tissue Doppler Imaging peak systolic velocity; RVEF, two-dimensional RV ellipsoid ejection fraction; RV GLS, RV Free Wall Global Longitudinal Strain; mean RV GLSR, mean RV free wall global longitudinal strain rate; TAPSE:SPAP, TAPSE to Systolic Pulmonary Artery Pressure Ratio.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Unadjusted Kaplan–Meier curves comparing 5 different assessments of LV systolic function. In all panels, green lines represent preserved systolic function and blue lines represent impaired function (clockwise from top-left): LVEF > 48%, LV MR dp/dt < 570 mmHg/s, LV TDI S’ ≤ 0.06 m/s, LV GLS > −6.32%, LV GLSR > −0.86 s–1. LVEF, LV ejection fraction; LV MR dp/dt, LV mitral regurgitation Δp/Δt; LV S’, LV Tissue Doppler Imaging (TDI) lateral mitral annular peak systolic velocity; LV GLS, LV Global Longitudinal Strain; LV GLSR, LV global longitudinal strain rate.

References

    1. Cleland JG, Swedberg K, Follath F, Komajda M, Cohen-Solal A, Aguilar JC, et al. The EuroHeart Failure survey programme—a survey on the quality of care among patients with heart failure in Europe: part 1: patient characteristics and diagnosis. Eur Heart J. (2003) 24:442–63. 10.1016/s0195-668x(02)00823-0 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jessup J, Brozena S. Heart failure. N Engl J Med. (2003) 348:2007–18. - PubMed
    1. Adams KF, Jr., Fonarow GC, Emerman CL, LeJemtel TH, Costanzo MR, Abraham WT, et al. Characteristics and outcomes of patients hospitalized for heart failure in the United States: rationale, design, and preliminary observations from the first 100,000 cases in the Acute Decompensated Heart Failure National Registry (ADHERE). Am Heart J. (2005) 149:209–16. 10.1016/j.ahj.2004.08.005 - DOI - PubMed
    1. AlHabib KF, Elasfar AA, Alfaleh H, Kashour T, Hersi A, AlBackr H, et al. Clinical features, management, and short-and long-term outcomes of patients with acute decompensated heart failure: phase I results of the HEARTS database. Eur J Heart Fail. (2014) 16:461–9. 10.1002/ejhf.57 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Coles AH, Fisher K, Darling C, Yarzebski J, McManus DD, Gore JM, et al. Long-term survival for patients with acute decompensated heart failure according to ejection fraction findings. Am J Cardiol. (2014) 114:862–8. 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.06.017 - DOI - PMC - PubMed