Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug;32(8):2807-2813.
doi: 10.1007/s11695-022-06123-8. Epub 2022 Jun 6.

Single-Anastomosis Sleeve Jejunal (SAS-J) Bypass as Revisional Surgery After Primary Restrictive Bariatric Procedures

Affiliations

Single-Anastomosis Sleeve Jejunal (SAS-J) Bypass as Revisional Surgery After Primary Restrictive Bariatric Procedures

Alaa M Sewefy et al. Obes Surg. 2022 Aug.

Abstract

Purpose: Single-anastomosis sleeve jejunal (SAS-J) bypass is the modification of a single-anastomosis sleeve ileal (SASI) bypass with a short biliary limb. SAS-J bypass is reported to be a good primary bariatric procedure. This study aimed to evaluate the results of SAS-J bypass as a revisional surgery after failed primary restrictive bariatric procedures.

Material and methods: This was a prospective cohort study including 43 patients who underwent SAS-J bypass as a revisional surgery for weight regain after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), laparoscopic adjustable gastric band (LAGB), or laparoscopic gastric plication.

Results: Of the total patients, 35 (81.4%) were female, and 8 (18.6%) were male. The mean BMI was 46.3 kg/m2. The mean age was 41 years. Thirty-two patients (74.4%) had a failed sleeve, 9 (20.9%) had a failed LAGB, and 2 (4.7%) had a failed gastric plication. The mean operative time was 104 min. Intra-abdominal bleeding occurred in 1 case (2.3%), and intraluminal bleeding occurred in 3 cases (7%). No case (0%) developed a leak. The percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL) reached 76.5% after 1 year. Type 2 diabetes mellitus remission occurred in all diabetic patients, hypertension remitted in 80%, hyperlipidemia remitted in 83.3%, and obstructive sleep apnea syndrome improved in all cases. Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms were improved in 86.7% of patients. Significant biliary gastritis occurred in 4 patients (9.3%). Dumping syndrome was reported in 4 patients (9.3%).

Conclusions: SAS-J bypass was effective as a salvage surgery after failed restrictive bariatric procedures, but long-term follow-up is needed.

Keywords: Revisional bariatric surgery; SASI; Single-anastomosis sleeve jejunal bypass; Sleeve loop bipartition.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Schematic demonstration of SAS-J bypass
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The effect of SAS-J bypass on BMI

References

    1. Poublon N, Chidi I, Bethlehem M, et al. One anastomosis gastric bypass vs. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass remedy for insufficient weight loss and weight regain after failed restrictive bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2020;30:3287–3294. doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-04536-x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Marsk R, Jonas E, Gartzios H, Stockeld D, Granström L, Freedman J. High revision rates after laparoscopic vertical banded gastroplasty. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2009;5(1):94–98. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2008.05.011. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wang W, Huang MT, Wei PL, et al. Laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass for failed vertical banded gastroplasty. Obes Surg. 2004;14:777–782. doi: 10.1381/0960892041590953. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kermansaravi M, Shahmiri SS, DavarpanahJazi AH, et al. One anastomosis/mini-gastric bypass (OAGB/MGB) as revisional surgery following primary restrictive bariatric procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Surg. 2021;31:370–383. doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-05079-x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Osorio J, Lazzara C, Admella V, et al. Revisional laparoscopic SADI-S vs. duodenal switch following failed primary sleeve gastrectomy: a single-center comparison of 101 consecutive cases. Obes Surg. 2021;31:3667–3674. doi: 10.1007/s11695-021-05469-9. - DOI - PubMed