Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023;27(3):315-320.
doi: 10.1080/10903127.2022.2086652. Epub 2022 Jun 22.

Safety of an Alternative Care Protocol for EMS Non-Transport in the COVID-19 Pandemic

Nancy Glober  1 , Jacob Hamilton  2 , Nicholas Montelauro  1 , Alex Ulintz  1 , Thomas Arkins  3 , Michael Supples  1 , Mark Liao  1 , Daniel O'Donnell  1 , Greg Faris  1
Affiliations

Safety of an Alternative Care Protocol for EMS Non-Transport in the COVID-19 Pandemic

Nancy Glober et al. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2023.

Abstract

Aim: Our primary goal was to evaluate safety of a new emergency medical services (EMS) protocol directing non-transport of low-acuity patients during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of all patients in Marion County, Indiana, from March 23, 2020 to May 25, 2020 for whom a novel non-transport protocol was used by EMS for patients with low-acuity COVID-19 symptoms. We assessed paramedic compliance with the protocol to determine numbers and types of deviations. We further reviewed a statewide health information exchange database to identify any patients with emergency department (ED) visits, hospital admissions, or death within 30 days of the EMS non-transport. For ED and hospital visits, we collected ED or admission diagnoses to determine if the etiologies were COVID-related.

Results: Between March 24, 2020 and May 25, 2020, 222 patients were documented as "Treated, Released (per protocol)." The protocol was correctly applied 144 times (64.8%). The other 78 times, although the EMS clinicians documented use of the protocol, it was not actually used (e.g., another protocol such as "no medical emergency" was used). Of the 144 patients for whom the protocol was used, in 55 cases (38.2%), the clinicians documented patient factors that should have contraindicated use of the protocol (e.g., chest pain, past medical history of asthma). The protocol was applied 5 times (3.5%) in pediatric patients. Two patients were admitted to the hospital within 72 hours of incorrect application of the protocol; both were for COVID-related complaints. Two patients were admitted to the hospital within 72 hours of correct protocol use; one was for a COVID-related complaint.

Conclusion: In this case series, paramedics demonstrated large deviations from the novel non-transport protocol. Several patients were admitted to the hospital within 72 hours of non-transport both when the protocol was used correctly, and when it was used incorrectly.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure Statement

The authors do not have any conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Between March 24, 2020 and May 23, 2020. (a) Number of times the treat-in-place protocol was used each day, and (b) number of COVID-19 reported each day (7).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Patients on whom the protocol was reportedly used and subsequent outcomes.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Catlett CL, Jenkins JL, Millin MG. Role of emergency medical services in disaster response: resource document for the National Association of EMS Physicians position statement. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2011;15(3):420–5. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2011.561401. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Al Amiry A, Maguire BJ. Emergency Medical Services (EMS) calls during COVID-19: early lessons learned for systems planning (a narrative review). Open Access Emerg Med. 2021;13:407–14. doi: 10.2147/OAEM.S324568. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yeung T, Shannon B, Perillo S, Nehme Z, Jennings P, Olaussen A. Review article: outcomes of patients who are not transported following ambulance attendance: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Emerg Med Australas. 2019;31(3):321–31. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.13288. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Moffet HH, Warton EM, Siegel L, Sporer K, Lipska KJ, Karter AJ. Hypoglycemia patients and transport by EMS in Alameda County, 2013–15. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2017;21(6):767–72. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2017.1321707. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Minhas R, Vogelaar G, Wang D, Almansoori W, Lang E, Blanchard IE, Lazarenko G, McRae A. A prehospital treat-and-release protocol for supraventricular tachycardia. CJEM. 2015; 17(4):395–402. doi: 10.1017/cem.2014.53. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources