Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug 1;93(2S Suppl 1):S12-S15.
doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003711. Epub 2022 Jun 2.

Battlefield pain summit 2022: Expert consensus statements

Thomas R Stark  1 , Nathan L Davidson, Jeremy W Cannon, Travis M Polk, Stacy A Shackelford, Jonathan D Stallings, Andrew P Cap; Battlefield Pain Research Steering Committee and Panel Discussion Members∗
Collaborators, Affiliations

Battlefield pain summit 2022: Expert consensus statements

Thomas R Stark et al. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. .

Abstract

Background: Battlefield pain occurs in combat casualties who experience multiple severe injuries. The nature of battlefield scenarios requires a distinct approach to battlefield pain research. A battlefield pain summit was thus convened to identify shortcomings in the current understanding of battlefield pain management, review the current state of battlefield pain research, and shape the direction of future research.

Methods: On January 10 to 11, 2022, a hybrid in-person and virtual meeting hosted by the US Army Institute of Surgical Research defined research priorities for the Combat Casualty Care Research Program's Battlefield Pain research portfolio. Summit participants identified the following key focus areas under the umbrella of battlefield pain research: battlefield injury patterns; use of ketamine and nonopioid analgesics; analgesic delivery systems; the impact of analgesia on performance, cognition, and survival; training methods; battlefield regional anesthesia; and research models. Preliminary statements presented during the summit were refined and rank ordered through a Delphi process.

Results: Consensus was achieved on 7 statements addressing ideal analgesic properties, delivery systems, operational performance concerns, and pain training. Ketamine was identified as safe and effective for battlefield use, and further research into nonopioid analgesics represented a high priority.

Conclusion: The 7 consensus statements that emerged from this battlefield pain summit serve as a template to define the near-term research priorities for military-specific battlefield pain research.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Mazuchowski EL, Kotwal RS, Janak JC, Howard JT, Harcke HT, Montgomery HR, et al. Mortality review of US Special Operations Command battle-injured fatalities. J Trauma Acute Care Surg . 2020;88:686–695.
    1. Blackbourne LH, Baer DG, Cestero RF, Inaba K, Rasmussen TE. Exsanguination shock: the next frontier in prevention of battlefield mortality. J Trauma . 2011;71(Suppl):S1–S3.
    1. Cap AP, Polk TM, Cannon JW. Charting a new path after two decades of war and a global pandemic. J Trauma Acute Care Surg . 2021;91(Suppl 2):S1–S5.
    1. Clifford JL, Fowler M, Hansen JJ, Cheppudira B, Nyland JE, Salas MM, et al. State of the science review: advances in pain management in wounded service members over a decade of war. J Trauma Acute Care Surg . 2014;77(Suppl 2):S228–S236.
    1. Kim SY, Buckenmaier CC, Howe EG, Choi KH. The newest battlefield opioid, sublingual sufentanil: a proposal to refine opioid usage in the U.S. Military. Mil Med . 2022;187:77–83.

LinkOut - more resources