Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness Comparison of Catheter Ablation and Antiarrhythmic Drugs in Atrial Fibrillation Treatment Using Discrete Event Simulation
- PMID: 35667785
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2021.10.014
Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness Comparison of Catheter Ablation and Antiarrhythmic Drugs in Atrial Fibrillation Treatment Using Discrete Event Simulation
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the lifetime cost-effectiveness of 3 widely used atrial fibrillation (AF) treatments from the perspectives of Chinese healthcare system: antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs), ThermoCool SmartTouch guided by ablation index (STAI), and second-generation cryoballoon (CB2).
Methods: A discrete event simulation (DES) model was implemented to compare the lifetime cost-effectiveness of AADs, STAI, and CB2. AF disease progression was explicitly modeled based on the Atrial Fibrillation Progression Trial clinical study results. The base-case analysis assumed that patients with paroxysmal AF (PAF) entered the model at the age of 55 years and had a CHA2DS2-VASc (Congestive heart failure, Hypertension, Age ( > 65 = 1 point, > 75 = 2 points), Diabetes, previous Stroke/transient ischemic attack (2 points)-Vascular disease (peripheral arterial disease, previous myocardial infarction, aortic atheroma), Age 65 to 74 years, and Sex category) score of 2 for males and 3 for females. Model parameter uncertainties were incorporated throughout the DES simulation with full probabilistic model parameterization.
Results: The lifetime cost-effectiveness evaluations showed that patients treated with AADs gained an average of 4.98 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and 9.63 life-years (LYs) at an average cost of US dollar (USD) 15 374. Patients treated with CB2 gained 5.92 QALYs and 10.74 LYs at an average cost of USD 26 811. The STAI group gained an average of 6.55 QALYs and 11.57 LYs at an average cost of USD 24 722. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios was USD 5927 and USD 12 167 per QALY for STAI versus AADs and CB2 versus AADs, respectively. Assuming the willingness-to-pay threshold for China is USD 30 390 per QALY, both ablation treatments will be cost-effective compared with AADs for patients with PAF.
Conclusions: The DES model demonstrated that catheter ablations are more cost-effective than AADs for patients with PAF under the healthcare system in China. Among catheter ablation technologies, STAI provides better outcomes at lower costs.
Keywords: ablation; atrial fibrillation; cost-effectiveness; discrete event simulation.
Copyright © 2021 ISPOR–The Professional Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Radiofrequency ablation using the ThermoCool SmartTouch Catheter guided by ablation index versus antiarrhythmic drugs in atrial fibrillation treatment in China: a cost-consequence analysis.J Comp Eff Res. 2024 Feb;13(2):e230035. doi: 10.57264/cer-2023-0035. Epub 2024 Jan 11. J Comp Eff Res. 2024. PMID: 38205729 Free PMC article.
-
A Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Comparing Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation with Antiarrhythmic Drugs in Treatment of Chinese Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2019 Dec;19(6):569-577. doi: 10.1007/s40256-019-00349-1. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2019. PMID: 31090018
-
An economic evaluation of first-line cryoballoon ablation versus antiarrhythmic drug therapy for the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation from a German healthcare payer perspective.BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Nov 26;24(1):1474. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11967-0. BMC Health Serv Res. 2024. PMID: 39593158 Free PMC article.
-
Long-Term Outcomes and Improvements in Quality of Life in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Treated with Catheter Ablation vs. Antiarrhythmic Drugs.Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2021 May;21(3):299-320. doi: 10.1007/s40256-020-00435-9. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2021. PMID: 33000397
-
Dronedarone for the treatment of atrial fibrillation: a NICE single technology appraisal.Pharmacoeconomics. 2012 Jan;30(1):35-46. doi: 10.2165/11594280-000000000-00000. Pharmacoeconomics. 2012. PMID: 22136303 Review.
Cited by
-
Cost Effectiveness of Catheter Ablation Versus Antiarrhythmic Drugs for Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2025 Mar;25(2):169-189. doi: 10.1007/s40256-024-00693-x. Epub 2024 Nov 21. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2025. PMID: 39570492 Free PMC article.
-
Cost Effectiveness of Strategies to Manage Atrial Fibrillation in Middle- and High-Income Countries: A Systematic Review.Pharmacoeconomics. 2023 Aug;41(8):913-943. doi: 10.1007/s40273-023-01276-5. Epub 2023 May 19. Pharmacoeconomics. 2023. PMID: 37204698 Free PMC article.
-
Catheter ablation using advanced porous tip contact force-sensing radiofrequency catheter: Impact on health care utilization among patients with persistent atrial fibrillation.Heart Rhythm O2. 2022 Jul 21;3(5):474-481. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2022.07.003. eCollection 2022 Oct. Heart Rhythm O2. 2022. PMID: 36340499 Free PMC article.
-
Interactions between atrial fibrosis and inflammation in atrial fibrillation.Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Jul 10;12:1578148. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1578148. eCollection 2025. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025. PMID: 40709209 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Antiarrhythmic drug therapy and catheter ablation in patients with paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2024 Jun 25;24(1):321. doi: 10.1186/s12872-024-03983-z. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2024. PMID: 38918704 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical