Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jun 6;22(1):753.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08120-0.

Contributing to collaborative health governance in Africa: a realist evaluation of the Universal Health Coverage Partnership

Emilie Robert  1   2   3 , Sylvie Zongo  4 , Dheepa Rajan  5 , Valéry Ridde  6
Affiliations

Contributing to collaborative health governance in Africa: a realist evaluation of the Universal Health Coverage Partnership

Emilie Robert et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: Policy dialogue, a collaborative governance mechanism, has raised interest among international stakeholders. They see it as a means to strengthen health systems governance and to participate in the development of health policies that support universal health coverage. In this context, WHO has set up the Universal Health Coverage Partnership. This Partnership aims to support health ministries in establishing inclusive, participatory, and evidence-informed policy dialogue. The general purpose of our study is to understand how and in what contexts the Partnership may support policy dialogue and with what outcomes. More specifically, our study aims to answer two questions: 1) How and in what contexts may the Partnership initiate and nurture policy dialogue? 2) How do collaboration dynamics unfold within policy dialogue supported by the Partnership? METHODS: We conducted a multiple-case study realist evaluation based on Emerson's integrative framework for collaborative governance to investigate the role of the Partnership in policy dialogue on three policy issues in six sub-Saharan African countries: health financing (Burkina Faso and Democratic Republic of Congo), health planning (Cabo Verde, Niger, and Togo), and aid coordination for health (Liberia). We interviewed 121 key informants, analyzed policy documents, and observed policy dialogue events.

Results: The Partnership may facilitate the initiation of policy dialogue when: 1) stakeholders feel uncertain about health sector issues and acknowledge their interdependence in responding to such issues, and 2) policy dialogue coincides with their needs and interests. In this context, policy dialogue enables stakeholders to build a shared understanding of issues and of the need for action and encourages collective leadership. However, ministries' weak ownership of policy dialogue and stakeholders' lack of confidence in their capacity for joint action hinder their engagement and curb the institutionalization of policy dialogue.

Conclusions: Development aid actors wishing to support policy dialogue must do so over the long term so that collaborative governance becomes routine and a culture of collaboration has time to grow. Public administrations should develop collaborative governance mechanisms that are transparent and intelligible in order to facilitate stakeholder engagement.

Keywords: Africa; Collaboration; Development aid; Governance; Health; Policy dialogue; Realist evaluation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

E.R., S.Z. and V.R. received funding from the World Health Organization Department of Health Systems Governance and Financing to conduct research on the Universal Health Coverage Partnership. The publishing costs are funded by the World Health Organization Department of Health Systems Governance and Financing. D.R. is involved in the Universal Health Coverage Partnership.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Policy dialogue on health planning in Togo
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Policy dialogue on health financing in DRC and on aid coordination in Liberia
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Policy dialogue on health financing in Burkina Faso and on health planning in Niger and Cabo Verde
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
The Partnership theory
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Weiss TG. Governance, good governance, and global governance: conceptual and actual challenges. In: Weiss TG, editor. Thinking about Global Governance: Why People and Ideas Matter. London: Routledge; 2000. pp. 168–189.
    1. Mkandawire T. ‘Good governance’: the itinerary of an idea. Dev Pract. 2007;17(4–5):679–681. doi: 10.1080/09614520701469997. - DOI
    1. Blundo G. Editorial. La gouvernance, entre technique de gouvernement et outil d'exploration empirique. Bulletin de l’APAD. 2002;2002(23–24):1–13.
    1. Savedoff WD. Governance in the Health Sector: A Strategy for Measuring Determinants and Performance. Washington (DC): The World Bank; 2011. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/812751468158068363/pdf/WPS5655.... Accessed 29 Oct 2021.
    1. UNICEF. National investment and governance for health: How countries invest in health matters immensely for children. UNICEF. 2020. https://www.unicef.org/health/national-investment-and-governance. Accessed 29 Oct 2021.

LinkOut - more resources