Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jun 6;22(1):251.
doi: 10.1186/s12886-022-02470-3.

Screening for retinopathy of prematurity in North China

Affiliations

Screening for retinopathy of prematurity in North China

Li Li et al. BMC Ophthalmol. .

Abstract

Purpose: To analyze the incidence and severity of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) in north China, and to evaluate the effectiveness of different ROP screening criteria.

Patients and methods: The screening data of premature infants were collected from 2016 to 2021. The severity of ROP was graded according to the International Classification of Retinopathy of Prematurity (2005). And the treatment for ROP followed the Early Treatment for Retinopathy of Prematurity Cooperative Group. The effects of gestational age (GA) and birth weight (BW) on the incidence and severity of ROP were evaluated. The screening data were also analyzed using different ROP screening guidelines.

Results: A total of 4069 infants underwent ROP screening, and 728 infants (17.9%) were diagnosed with ROP. Of those, 78 infants (1.9%) received treatments. Gestational age and BW showed significant differences between infants with and without ROP (29.1 ± 2.1w vs. 32.9 ± 2.6w, p < 0.001; 1362.7 ± 427.3 g vs. 1751.9 ± 509.4 g, p < 0.001; respectively). Fifty-six infants (7.69%), 188 infants (25.82%), and 104 infants (14.29%) in all infants with ROP would have been missed according to the China, USA, and UK screening guidelines respectively. If GA ≤ 33 weeks and/or BW ≤ 2100 g were considered as screening criteria, only one infant (0.14%) with critical systemic illness was missed diagnosed with severe ROP.

Conclusion: Gestational age and BW are major risk factors for the incidence and severity of ROP. And the incidence and treatment rate of ROP in Tianjin is similar to that reported in the other regions of China. Modified ROP screening criteria were considered to be more effective in Tianjin.

Keywords: Birth weight; Gestational age; Retinopathy of prematurity; Screening criteria.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No authors have any financial/conflicting interests to disclose.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Distribution of infants with retinopathy of prematurity according to gestational age
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Distribution of infants with retinopathy of prematurity according to birth weight

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Gilbert C, Foster A. Childhood blindness in the context of VISION 2020–the right to sight. Bull World Health Organ. 2001;79(3):227–232. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zhu JF, Zou HD, He XG, et al. Cross-sectional investigation of visual impairing diseases in Shanghai blind children school. Chin Med J (Engl) 2012;125:3654–3659. - PubMed
    1. Li XX. Chinese Ophthalmological Society Fundus Diseases Group. Screening guidelines of retinopathy of prematurity in China (2014) Chin J Ophthalmol. 2014;50(12):933–5.
    1. Fierson WM. American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Ophthalmology; American Academy of Ophthalmology; American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus; American Association of Certified Orthoptists. Screening examination of premature infants for retinopathy of prematurity. Pediatrics. 2018;142(6):e20183061. doi: 10.1542/peds.2018-3061. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wilkinson AR, Haines L, Head K, et al. UK retinopathy of prematurity guideline. Early Hum Dev. 2008;84(2):71–74. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2007.12.004. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources