Prognostic factors related to overall survival in adolescent and young adults with medulloblastoma: A systematic review

Abstract

Background: Medulloblastoma is a rare diagnosis among adolescents and young adults (AYA). Though prognostic factors and treatment are well characterized among children with medulloblastoma, equivalent data for AYA are sparse. We conducted a systematic review to identify predictors of survival among AYA with medulloblastoma.

Methods: We searched for primary studies of AYA (age 15-39 at diagnosis) with medulloblastoma in high-income countries within OVID MEDLINE, EMBASE, and EBM Reviews-Cochrane library databases from inception to August 2020. Patient demographics, primary outcomes, and univariate and multivariable data on all prognostic factors were collected from included studies. Prognosticators were characterized as patient, disease, or treatment-related.

Results: We identified 18 articles. 5-year overall survival ranged between 40% and 89%, while disease-free survival ranged from 49% to 89%. Study quality was low as assessed by the Quality in Prognostic factor Studies tool. Though meta-analyses were not possible due heterogeneity, narrative summaries suggested that lower disease burden, superior postoperative functional status, and higher doses and larger fields of radiation were associated with improved survival. Reported chemotherapy regimens were heterogeneous in timing, agents, and relationship with radiation, precluding meaningful comparisons. Only one study included molecular subgroups for analysis, with the majority (76.5%) of tumors classified as Sonic Hedgehog (SHH).

Conclusions: Prognostication and treatment of AYA medulloblastoma is limited by a dearth of primary evidence and lack of specificity for patients aged 15-39. Dedicated prospective trials to delineate the benefit of various chemotherapy and radiation regimens are required in this population to identify prognosticators and ideal treatment regimens.

Keywords: adolescent; medulloblastoma; prognosis; systematic review; young adults.

Figure 1.

PRISMA flow diagram illustrating study selection process.