Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022;65(2):533-543.
doi: 10.1007/s41027-022-00368-8. Epub 2022 May 26.

A Note on Industrial Relations Code, 2020

Affiliations

A Note on Industrial Relations Code, 2020

Gopal Krishna Roy et al. Indian J Labour Econ. 2022.

Abstract

In this note, we assess the newly introduced Industrial Relations Code (IRC) 2020. First, we compare the provisions in IRC 2020 with its predecessor, Industrial Disputes Act (IDA) 1947, and the amendments to IDA 1947 in 1976 and 1982 regarding the employment protection provisions against layoffs, retrenchments, and closures. We find that IRC 2020 merely restored the factory-size threshold to the initial IDA amendment 1976 level of 300 or more workers to which IDA 1947 originally applied from 100 or more workers as notified in the 1982 IDA amendment. We calculate the effect of the threshold-size change on the workers and factories on the firms registered under the Factories Act 1948 2(m). We find from the ASI 2017-2018 data that an estimated 7.07% of the factories and 15.97% of the workers will be affected due to the change in the threshold size introduced through IRC, 2020. Finally, we conclude by discussing the current relevance of the employment protection legislation during the pandemic time and the need for discretionary usage and temporary expansion of coverage of employment protection provisions under the IRC if warranted.

Keywords: India; Industrial relations; Labour law; Labour policy; Organised manufacturing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interestThe authors declare no competing interests.

References

    1. Acharya VV, Baghai RP, Subramanian KV. Labor Laws and Innovation. The Journal of Law and Economics. 2013;56(4):997–1037. doi: 10.1086/674106. - DOI
    1. Ahsan A, Pagés C. Are All Labor Regulations Equal? Evidence from Indian Manufacturing. Journal of Comparative Economics. 2009;37(1):62–75. doi: 10.1016/j.jce.2008.09.001. - DOI
    1. Amirapu A. Justice Delayed is Growth Denied: The Effect of Slow Courts on Relationship-Specific Industries in India. Economic Development and Cultural Change. 2020 doi: 10.1086/711171. - DOI
    1. Besley T, Burgess R. Can Labour Regulation Hinder Economic Performance? Evidence From India. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 2004;119(1):91–134. doi: 10.1162/003355304772839533. - DOI
    1. Bhattacharjea A. Labour Market Regulation and Industrial Performance in India: A Critical Review of the Empirical Evidence. Indian Journal of Labour Economics. 2006;49(2):211–232.

LinkOut - more resources