Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May 20:16:897870.
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.897870. eCollection 2022.

Upper Limb Stroke Rehabilitation Using Surface Electromyography: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Affiliations

Upper Limb Stroke Rehabilitation Using Surface Electromyography: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Maria Munoz-Novoa et al. Front Hum Neurosci. .

Abstract

Background: Upper limb impairment is common after stroke, and many will not regain full upper limb function. Different technologies based on surface electromyography (sEMG) have been used in stroke rehabilitation, but there is no collated evidence on the different sEMG-driven interventions and their effect on upper limb function in people with stroke.

Aim: Synthesize existing evidence and perform a meta-analysis on the effect of different types of sEMG-driven interventions on upper limb function in people with stroke.

Methods: PubMed, SCOPUS, and PEDro databases were systematically searched for eligible randomized clinical trials that utilize sEMG-driven interventions to improve upper limb function assessed by Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA-UE) in stroke. The PEDro scale was used to evaluate the methodological quality and the risk of bias of the included studies. In addition, a meta-analysis utilizing a random effect model was performed for studies comparing sEMG interventions to non-sEMG interventions and for studies comparing different sEMG interventions protocols.

Results: Twenty-four studies comprising 808 participants were included in this review. The methodological quality was good to fair. The meta-analysis showed no differences in the total effect, assessed by total FMA-UE score, comparing sEMG interventions to non-sEMG interventions (14 studies, 509 participants, SMD 0.14, P 0.37, 95% CI -0.18 to 0.46, I2 55%). Similarly, no difference in the overall effect was found for the meta-analysis comparing different types of sEMG interventions (7 studies, 213 participants, SMD 0.42, P 0.23, 95% CI -0.34 to 1.18, I2 73%). Twenty out of the twenty-four studies, including participants with varying impairment levels at all stages of stroke recovery, reported statistically significant improvements in upper limb function at post-sEMG intervention compared to baseline.

Conclusion: This review and meta-analysis could not discern the effect of sEMG in comparison to a non-sEMG intervention or the most effective type of sEMG intervention for improving upper limb function in stroke populations. Current evidence suggests that sEMG is a promising tool to further improve functional recovery, but randomized clinical trials with larger sample sizes are needed to verify whether the effect on upper extremity function of a specific sEMG intervention is superior compared to other non-sEMG or other type of sEMG interventions.

Keywords: Fugl-Meyer Assessment; biofeedback; electromyography; paresis; stroke; upper limb function.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Flow chart (PRISMA) of study selection. RCT, Randomized clinical trial; sEMG; surface electromyography, FMA-UE, Fugl-Meyer Assessment for the upper extremity.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Number of studies performed in patients with chronic and subacute stroke. s-EMG v/s sEMG, studies comparing different surface electromyography driven interventions; s-EMG v/s non-sEMG, studies comparing surface electromyography driven interventions with non-surface electromyography driven groups.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Number of studies performed in patients with moderate to severe upper limb impairment. s-EMG v/s sEMG, studies comparing different surface electromyography driven interventions; s-EMG v/s non-sEMG, studies comparing surface electromyography driven interventions with non-surface electromyography driven groups.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Number of studies using different sEMG interventions shown over time. s-EMG, surface electromyography; sEMG-NMS, sEMG triggered neuromuscular stimulation; sEMG-RT, s-EMG driven robot therapy; sEMG-BFB, sEMG providing visual and/or auditory biofeedback; +, combine with.
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
Meta-analyses of the effect of sEMG intervention versus non-sEMG intervention on total FMA-UE score. s-EMG, surface electromyography; NMS, neuromuscular stimulation; +, combine with.
FIGURE 6
FIGURE 6
Meta-analyses of the effect of sEMG intervention versus another sEMG intervention on total FMA-UE score. s-EMG, surface electromyography; NMS, neuromuscular stimulation; +, combine with.

References

    1. Amasyali S. Y., Yaliman A. (2016). Comparison of the effects of mirror therapy and electromyography-triggered neuromuscular stimulation on hand functions in stroke patients: a pilot study. Int. J. Rehabil. Res. 39 302–307. 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000186 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Basteris A., Amirabdollahian F., Nijenhuis S., Buurke J., Prange G. (2014). Training modalities in robot-mediated upper limb rehabilitation in stroke: a framework for classification based on a systematic review. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 11 1–15. 10.1186/1743-0003-11-111 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bolton D. A. E., Cauraugh J. H., Hausenblas H. A. (2004). Electromyogram-triggered neuromuscular stimulation and stroke motor recovery of arm/hand functions: a meta-analysis. J. Neurol. Sci. 223 121–127. 10.1016/j.jns.2004.05.005 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Boyaci A., Topuz O., Alkan H., Ozgen M., Sarsan A., Yildiz N., et al. (2013). Comparison of the effectiveness of active and passive neuromuscular electrical stimulation of hemiplegic upper extremities: a randomized, controlled trial. Int. J. Rehabil. Res. 36 315–322. 10.1097/MRR.0b013e328360e541 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bustrén E. L., Sunnerhagen K. S., Alt Murphy M. (2017). Movement kinematics of the ipsilesional upper extremity in persons with moderate or mild stroke. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair 31 376–386. 10.1177/1545968316688798 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources