Shoulder Arthroplasty Options for Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis in Young and Active Patients (<60 Years Old): A Systematic Review
- PMID: 35669623
- PMCID: PMC9163728
- DOI: 10.1177/24715492221087014
Shoulder Arthroplasty Options for Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis in Young and Active Patients (<60 Years Old): A Systematic Review
Abstract
Aim: This study aims to describe the shoulder arthroplasty options for young and active patients (<60 years old) with glenohumeral osteoarthritis.
Methods: A systematic review of the literature was conducted by searching on Pubmed database. Studies that reported outcomes of patients with glenohumeral arthritis, younger than 60 years, that underwent shoulder arthroplasty [(Hemiarthroplasty (HA), Hemiarthroplasty with biological resurfacing (HABR), Total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), Reversed total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA)] were included. Data include patient characteristics, surgical technique, range of motion, pain relief, outcome scores, functional improvement, complications, need for and time to revision.
Results: A total of 1591 shoulders met the inclusion criteria. Shoulder arthroplasty provided improvements in terms of ROM on the 3 plains, forward flexion (FF), abduction (Abd) and external rotation (ER), in different proportions for each type of implant. Patients submitted to RSA had lower preoperative FF (p = 0.011), and the highest improvement (Δ) in Abd, but the worst in terms of ER (vsTSA, p = 0.05). HA had better ER postoperative values (vsRSA p = 0.049). Pain scores improved in all groups but no difference between them (p = 0.642). TSA and RSA groups had the best CS Δ (p = 0.012). HA group had higher complication rates (21.7%), RSA (19.4%, p = 0.034) and TSA (19.4%, p = 0.629) groups the lowest, and HABR had the highest rate of revisions (34.5%).
Conclusions: HA had the highest rate of complications and HABR unacceptable rates of revision. These implants have been replaced by modern TSAs, with RSA reserved for complex cases. Surgeons should be aware of the common pitfalls of each option.
Keywords: Arthroplasty; Glenohumeral; Osteoarthritis; Shoulder; Young patients.
© The Author(s) 2022.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Figures
References
-
- Chong PY, Srikumaran U, Kuye IO, et al.. Glenohumeral arthritis in the young patient. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011; 20(2): S30–S40 - PubMed
-
- Saltzman BM, Leroux TS, Verma NN, et al.. Glenohumeral osteoarthritis in the young patient. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2018; 26(17): e361–e370 - PubMed
-
- Bartelt R, Sperling JW, Schleck CD, et al.. Shoulder arthroplasty in patients aged fifty-five years or younger with osteoarthritis. J Shoulder Elb Surg 2011; 20(1): 123–130 - PubMed
-
- Saltzman MD, Mercer DM, Warme WJ, et al.. Comparison of patients undergoing primary shoulder arthroplasty before and after the age of fifty. J Bone Jt Surg - Ser A 2010; 92(1): 42–47 - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous