Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Mar;168(3):462-468.
doi: 10.1177/01945998221104658. Epub 2023 Jan 19.

Effects of Varying Laser Parameters During Laser Stapedotomy on Intracochlear Pressures

Affiliations

Effects of Varying Laser Parameters During Laser Stapedotomy on Intracochlear Pressures

Elizabeth F Boscoe et al. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023 Mar.

Abstract

Objective: Sensorineural hearing loss is a known complication of stapes surgery. We previously showed that laser stapedotomy can result in intracochlear pressures that are comparable to high sound pressure levels. Optimizing laser settings to those that correspond with the lowest pressure changes may mitigate risk for postoperative hearing loss. Here we quantify the effects of various laser parameters on intracochlear pressures and test the hypothesis that intracochlear pressure changes are proportional to the laser energy delivered.

Study design: Basic and translational science.

Setting: Cadaveric dissection and basic science laboratory.

Methods: Cadaveric human heads underwent mastoidectomies. Intracochlear pressures were measured via fiber-optic pressure probes placed in scala vestibuli and tympani. Pulses of varied stimulus power and duration from a 980-nm diode laser were applied to the stapes footplate.

Results: Sustained high-intensity pressures were observed in the cochlea during all laser applications. Observed pressure magnitudes increased monotonically with laser energy and rose linearly for lower stimulus durations and powers, but there was increased variability for laser applications of longer duration (200-300 ms) and/or higher power (8 W).

Conclusions: Results confirm that significant pressure changes occur during laser stapedotomy, which we hypothesize may cause injury. Overall energy delivered depends predictably on duration and power, but surgeons should use caution at the highest stimulus levels and longest pulse durations due to the increasing variability in intracochlear pressure under these stimulus conditions. While the risk to hearing from increased intracochlear pressures from laser stapedotomy remains unclear, these results affirm the need to optimize laser settings to avoid unintended injury.

Keywords: intracochlear pressure; laser; noise-induced hearing loss; stapedectomy; stapedotomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Statement: No relevant disclosures.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Schematic of experimental setup. Microscale pressure sensors were inserted into scala tympani and vestibuli via an extended round window approach in specimens. Laser stapedotomy was performed via a transcanal approach.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Idealized laser stimuli and representative traces of PIC recorded in a single specimen. Panel A illustrates laser parameters, Panels B and C show recorded pressure in scala vestibuli and tympani, respectively.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Peak pressures for all recordings across specimen. Peak PIC is plotted against measured duration for scala vestibuli (A) and tympani (B). Marker color and shape illustrate stimulus duration and power, respectively.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Pressure area under the curve for all recordings across specimen. PICAUC is plotted against measured duration for scala vestibuli (A) and tympani (B). Marker color and shape illustrate stimulus duration and power, respectively.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Pressure area under the curve as a function of anticipated energy delivered. PICAUC is plotted against the anticipated energy delivered and data variability is shown for scala vestibuli (A,C) and tympani (B,D).

Similar articles

References

    1. Marinelli JP, Totten DJ, Chauhan KK, et al. The Rise and Fall of Otosclerosis: A Population-based Study of Disease Incidence Spanning 70 Years. Otol Neurotol. 2020;41(9):e1082–e1090. doi:10.1097/mao.0000000000002763 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ealy M, Smith RJH. Medical Genetics in the Clinical Practice of ORL. Adv Oto-rhino-laryng. 2011;70:122–129. doi:10.1159/000322488 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yeh CF, Wang MC, Chu CH, Shiao AS. Predictors of hearing outcomes after stapes surgery in otosclerosis. Acta Oto-laryngol. 2019;139(12):1–5. doi:10.1080/00016489.2019.1648866 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Martin MBSt Rubinstein EN, Hirsch BE. High-Frequency Sensorineural Hearing Loss After Stapedectomy. Otol Neurotol. 2008;29(4):447–452. doi:10.1097/mao.0b013e318172d6a3 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Srivastava R, Cho W, Fergie N. The Use of Lasers in Stapes Surgery. Ear Nose Throat J. 2020;100(1_suppl):73S–76S. doi:10.1177/0145561320937828 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types