Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jun 7;10(2):E500-E507.
doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20210192. Print 2022 Apr-Jun.

The effect of legislation on firearm-related deaths in Canada: a systematic review

Affiliations

The effect of legislation on firearm-related deaths in Canada: a systematic review

Nick Bennett et al. CMAJ Open. .

Abstract

Background: Firearm misuse is common in cases of homicide, suicide and unintentional injury; this is a major public health issue, with societal and economic costs extending beyond the immediate injury or loss of life. We sought to review the evidence on the effectiveness of Canadian legislation in reducing deaths caused by firearms.

Methods: Five databases (PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science and Scopus) were searched from inception to May 2021 for studies evaluating the effect of Canadian gun control laws Bill C-51 (1977), Bill C-17 (1991) and Bill C-68 (1995) on rates of firearm-related death. Two reviewers performed article screening independently and in duplicate. We synthesized data using descriptive statistics. The primary outcome of interest was firearm-related mortality rates. Because of study heterogeneity, a meta-analysis was not performed.

Results: Overall, 1479 articles were screened, and 18 studies were included. Ten studies examined the effect on homicides, of which 5 reported a reduction during the postlegislation period; 1 study reported evidence of substitution from firearms to other methods of homicide among people aged 15-24 years. Eleven studies evaluated the effect on suicides, with 9 finding a reduction in suicide rates. Eight of these studies reported evidence of substitution from firearms to other suicide methods. Two studies investigated accidental deaths; neither reported any benefit after legislation.

Interpretation: Evidence supporting the effectiveness of Canadian firearms legislation in the reduction of homicide and accidental death rates is inconclusive; a decrease in firearm-related suicide rates was observed by most studies, but evidence of method substitution was also identified. Re-evaluation of existing laws may be beneficial to build an improved and effective evidence-based national framework for prevention of gun violence.

Prospero registration: CRD42020192486.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared. None of the authors declare participation of any kind in any pro- or anti-gun lobby groups.

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Flow diagram of studies selected for inclusion in the review.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Santaella-Tenorio J, Cerda M, Villaveces A, et al. What do we know about the association between firearm legislation and firearm-related injuries? Epidemiol Rev. 2016;38:140–57. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Liu L, Capaldi CA, Orpana HM, et al. Changes over time in means of suicide in Canada: an analysis of mortality data from 1981 to 2018. CMAJ. 2021;193:E331–8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Number, rate and percentage changes in rates of homicide victims [Table 35-10-0068-01] Ottawa: Statistics Canada; 2021. [accessed 2022 May 11]. Available https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/t1/tbl1/en/tv.action?pid=3510006801.
    1. Deaths, by cause, Chapter XX: External causes of morbidity and mortality (V01 to Y89) [Table 13-10-0156-01] Ottawa: Statistics Canada; 2020. [accessed 2020 July 14]. Available. - DOI
    1. History of firearms in Canada. Ottawa: Royal Canadian Mounted Police; 2020. [accessed 2021 Oct 4]. Available: https://www.rcmp-grc.gc.ca/en/history-firearms-canada.

Publication types