Effectiveness of prone position in acute respiratory distress syndrome and moderating factors of obesity class and treatment durations for COVID-19 patients: A meta-analysis
- PMID: 35672215
- PMCID: PMC8995327
- DOI: 10.1016/j.iccn.2022.103257
Effectiveness of prone position in acute respiratory distress syndrome and moderating factors of obesity class and treatment durations for COVID-19 patients: A meta-analysis
Abstract
Objectives: To examine the effectiveness of prone positioning on COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome with moderating factors in both traditional prone positioning (invasive mechanical ventilation) and awake self-prone positioning patients (non-invasive ventilation).
Research methodology: A comprehensive search was conducted in CINAHL, Cochrane library, Embase, Medline-OVID, NCBI SARS-CoV-2 Resources, ProQuest, Scopus, and Web of Science without language restrictions. All studies with prospective and experimental designs evaluating the effect of prone position patients with COVID-19 related to acute respiratory distress syndrome were included. Pooled standardised mean differences were calculated after prone position for primary (PaO2/FiO2) and secondary outcomes (SpO2 and PaO2) RESULTS: A total of 15 articles were eligible and included in the final analysis. Prone position had a statistically significant effect in improving PaO2/FiO2 with standardised mean difference of 1.10 (95%CI 0.60-1.59), SpO2 with standardised mean difference of 3.39 (95% CI 1.30-5.48), and PaO2 with standardised mean difference of 0.77 (95% CI 0.19-1.35). Patients with higher body mass index and longer duration/day are associated with larger standardised mean difference effect sizes for prone positioning.
Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate that prone position significantly improved oxygen saturation in COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome in both traditional prone positioning and awake self-prone positioning patients. Prone position should be recommended for patients with higher body mass index and longer durations to obtain the maximum effect.
Keywords: Acute respiratory distress syndrome; COVID-19; Coronavirus 2; Prone position; Respiratory failure.
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Figures
Similar articles
-
The efficacy and tolerance of prone positioning in non-intubation patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure and ARDS: a meta-analysis.Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2021 Jan-Dec;15:17534666211009407. doi: 10.1177/17534666211009407. Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2021. PMID: 33888007 Free PMC article.
-
Feasibility and physiological effects of prone positioning in non-intubated patients with acute respiratory failure due to COVID-19 (PRON-COVID): a prospective cohort study.Lancet Respir Med. 2020 Aug;8(8):765-774. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30268-X. Epub 2020 Jun 19. Lancet Respir Med. 2020. PMID: 32569585 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Prone Positioning in Moderate to Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Due to COVID-19: A Cohort Study and Analysis of Physiology.J Intensive Care Med. 2021 Feb;36(2):241-252. doi: 10.1177/0885066620980399. J Intensive Care Med. 2021. PMID: 33380236 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of prone positioning on oxygenation and static respiratory system compliance in COVID-19 ARDS vs. non-COVID ARDS.Respir Res. 2021 Aug 6;22(1):220. doi: 10.1186/s12931-021-01819-4. Respir Res. 2021. PMID: 34362368 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Prone positioning for non-intubated spontaneously breathing patients with acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Br J Anaesth. 2022 Feb;128(2):352-362. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2021.09.031. Epub 2021 Oct 14. Br J Anaesth. 2022. PMID: 34774295 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Risk of severe COVID-19 infection in persons with diabetes during the first and second waves in Denmark: A nationwide cohort study.Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 Oct 11;13:1025699. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.1025699. eCollection 2022. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022. PMID: 36303877 Free PMC article.
-
Prone Positioning in Mechanically Ventilated COVID-19 Patients: Timing of Initiation and Outcomes.J Clin Med. 2023 Jun 23;12(13):4226. doi: 10.3390/jcm12134226. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 37445260 Free PMC article.
-
Professional Quality of Life and Psychological Impact on Frontline Healthcare Worker during the Fourth Wave of COVID-19.J Nurs Manag. 2024 Jan 2;2024:2865063. doi: 10.1155/2024/2865063. eCollection 2024. J Nurs Manag. 2024. PMID: 40224890 Free PMC article.
-
A Comprehensive Review of Prone Ventilation in the Intensive Care Unit: Challenges and Solutions.Cureus. 2024 Mar 30;16(3):e57247. doi: 10.7759/cureus.57247. eCollection 2024 Mar. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 38686225 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Effect of Deep Respiration and Prone Position on Common Respiratory Symptoms in Patients with COVID-19: A Randomized Clinical Trial.Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2025 Mar 10;30(2):164-169. doi: 10.4103/ijnmr.ijnmr_34_23. eCollection 2025 Mar-Apr. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2025. PMID: 40275917 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Andrade C. Mean difference, standardized mean difference (SMD), and their use in meta-analysis: as simple as it gets. J. Clin. Psychiatry. 2020;81:81. - PubMed
-
- Bamford P., Bentley A., Dean J., Whitmore D., Wilson-Baig N. ICS guidance for prone positioning of the conscious COVID patient 2020. Intensive Care Soc. 2020
-
- Binda F., Marelli F., Galazzi A., Pascuzzo R., Adamini I., Laquintana D. Nursing management of prone positioning in patients with COVID-19. Crit. Care Nurse. 2021;41:27–35. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous