Primary care consultations and pain medicine prescriptions: a comparison between patients with and without chronic pain after total knee replacement
- PMID: 35672693
- PMCID: PMC9172077
- DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-05492-6
Primary care consultations and pain medicine prescriptions: a comparison between patients with and without chronic pain after total knee replacement
Abstract
Background: Approximately 20% of patients experience chronic pain after total knee replacement (TKR). The impact of chronic pain after TKR on primary care services in the UK is currently unknown. The aim of this study was to compare primary care consultations and pain medicine prescriptions between patients with and without chronic pain after TKR.
Methods: Data from 5,055 patients who received TKR between 2009 and 2016 with anonymised linked data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink Gold (CPRD) and English Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) programme were analysed. The exposure time was from 10 years pre-operative to eight years post-operative. Patients with a score ≤ 14 on the Oxford Knee Score pain component scale at 6 months post-operative were classified as having chronic pain after TKR. Primary care consultations and prescribed pain medicines were quantified, and costs calculated based on national cost data.
Results: 721 patients (14%) had chronic pain after TKR. The prevalence and costs of primary care consultations and pain medicine prescriptions per year were consistently higher for patients with chronic pain after TKR compared with those without chronic pain after TKR; these differences were observed both before and after surgery. There was a substantial and sustained increase in the cost of opioid prescriptions after surgery for patients with chronic pain after TKR, peaking at seven years post-operative.
Conclusions: Increased primary care consultations and pain medicine prescriptions associated with chronic pain after TKR represent a considerable financial cost to primary care services. Evaluation of interventions to reduce the risk of developing this pain condition and improve the early management of pain after TKR are needed to improve outcomes for patients and reduce costs to healthcare services.
Keywords: Chronic pain; England; Opioid; Primary care; Total knee replacement.
© 2022. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
AJ reports grants from NIHR during the conduct of the study; personal fees from Freshfields Bruckhaus Derringer, personal fees from Anthera Pharmaceuticals Ltd, outside the submitted work; RGH reports grants from NIHR during the conduct of the study; RPV reports research funding from UK-NIHR, Kyowa Kirin Services, International Osteoporosis Foundation, and lecture fees and/or consulting honoraria from Amgen, UCB, Kyowa Kirin Services, and Mereo Biopharma, all outside of the scope of this study; VW reports grants from NIHR during the conduct of the study. All other authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Figures



References
-
- Arthritis Research UK. Osteoarthritis in General Practice, 1. In; 2013.
-
- Bitton R. The economic burden of osteoarthritis. Am J Manag Care. 2009;15(8 Suppl):S230-5. - PubMed
-
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Osteoarthritis: Care and management in adults. NICE clinical guideline 177 2014. - PubMed
-
- National Joint Registry. 17th Annual report for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man. Hemel Hempstead: NJR centre; 2020.
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical