Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Jun 7;22(1):472.
doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04799-5.

Multidisciplinary treatment of retroperitoneal ectopic pregnancy: a case report and literature review

Affiliations
Review

Multidisciplinary treatment of retroperitoneal ectopic pregnancy: a case report and literature review

Hainan Xu et al. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. .

Abstract

Background: Retroperitoneal ectopic pregnancy (REP) is an extremely rare type of ectopic pregnancy, with a total of less than 32 cases reported in the English literature. Early diagnosis of REP is very difficult and all treatments entail a high risk of life-threatening complications.

Case presentation: A 29-year-old nulliparous woman presented a history of 50-day amenorrhea and 7-day upper abdominal pain without vaginal spotting. The serum beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG) value was 65,004 m-international units per milliliter (mIU/mL), but no intrauterine gestational sac was found via transvaginal sonography (TVS). Then transabdominal ultrasonography (TAS) and abdominal contrast-enhanced computer tomography (CT) identified a retroperitoneal ectopic pregnancy (REP) tightly adjacent to the inferior vena cava and the abdominal aorta. After consultation from a multidisciplinary team, systemic methotrexate (MTX, intramuscular 20 mg daily for 5 consecutive days) combined with ultrasound-guided local potassium chloride solution injection into the gestational sac was scheduled firstly for the patient. However, serum β-hCG continued to increase and the patient experienced worsening abdominal pain. Laparotomy was performed jointly by a gynecologist and a vascular surgeon. During the operation, the gestational sac with fetal bud measuring about 4.5 × 4.0x3.0 cm, tightly adherent to the surface of inferior vena cava and the left side of abdominal aorta, was carefully dissociated out from the surrounding tissues and removed en bloc. Histopathology examination confirmed the diagnosis of REP. The patient recovered uneventfully and her serum β-hCG returned to normal range on the 23th postoperative day.

Conclusions: Considering the possibility of REP and combined radiological examinations, such as ultrasonography and CT, are crucial for the early diagnosis of this rare condition. A multidisciplinary team is necessary to treat REP.

Keywords: Case report; Laparotomy; Retroperitoneal ectopic pregnancy; Review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig.1
Fig.1
The imaging examination before the laparotomy. a Transvaginal ultrasonography (TVS) revealed a thicken endometrium without intrauterine gestational sac. b Transabdominal ultrasonography (TAS) revealed a retroperitoneal pregnancy mass. c Abdominal computer tomography (CT) showed the retroperitoneal gestational sac (red arrow) was tightly adherent to the inferior vena cava (blue arrow) and abdominal aorta (yellow arrow). d Ultrasound-guided paracentesis and local potassium chloride (KCl) injection into the embryo bud
Fig.2
Fig.2
Pathologic examination verified the presence of chorionic villi in the tissue dissected from the retroperitoneal space. Hematoxylin and eosin staining: × 100
Fig.3
Fig.3
Changes in the patient’s serum beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG) levels

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Marion L, Meeks G. Ectopic Pregnancy: History, Incidence, Epidemiology, and Risk Factors. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2012;55(2):376–386. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0b013e3182516d7b. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Poole A, Haas D, Magann EF. Early abdominal ectopic pregnancies: a systematic review of the literature. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2012;74(4):249–260. doi: 10.1159/000342997. - DOI - PubMed
    1. OuYang Z, Wei S, Wu J, Wan Z, Zhang M, Zhong B. Retroperitoneal ectopic pregnancy: A literature review of reported cases. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021;259:113–118. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.02.014. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hall J, Harris M, Levy R, Walrond E. Retroperitoneal ectopic pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw. 1973;80:92–94. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1973.tb02140.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sotus P. Retroperitoneal ectopic pregnancy a case report. JAMA. 1977;238(13):1363–1364. doi: 10.1001/jama.1977.03280140041007. - DOI - PubMed

Substances