Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Jun 7;14(1):60.
doi: 10.1186/s13073-022-01062-6.

Addressing the routine failure to clinically identify monogenic cases of common disease

Affiliations
Review

Addressing the routine failure to clinically identify monogenic cases of common disease

Michael F Murray et al. Genome Med. .

Abstract

Changes in medical practice are needed to improve the diagnosis of monogenic forms of selected common diseases. This article seeks to focus attention on the need for universal genetic testing in common diseases for which the recommended clinical management of patients with specific monogenic forms of disease diverges from standard management and has evidence for improved outcomes.We review evidence from genomic screening of large patient cohorts, which has confirmed that important monogenic case identification failures are commonplace in routine clinical care. These case identification failures constitute diagnostic misattributions, where the care of individuals with monogenic disease defaults to the treatment plan offered to those with polygenic or non-genetic forms of the disease.The number of identifiable and actionable monogenic forms of common diseases is increasing with time. Here, we provide six examples of common diseases for which universal genetic test implementation would drive improved care. We examine the evidence to support genetic testing for common diseases, and discuss barriers to widespread implementation. Finally, we propose recommendations for changes to genetic testing and care delivery aimed at reducing diagnostic misattributions, to serve as a starting point for further evaluation and development of evidence-based guidelines for implementation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

M.F.M. is on the Scientific Advisory Board of 54gene and receives funding as a collaborator in a research grant from Pfizer. N.S.A.-H. was previously employed by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, has received speaker honoraria from Genentech and Allelica, is a paid consultant for 23andMe, and serves on the Scientific Advisory Board for Allelica. The remaining author declares that he has no competing interests.

References

    1. Carlson B. Familial hypercholesterolemia captures gene test controversies. Biotechnol Healthc. 2010;7(1):8–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kolata G. Breaking ranks, lab offers test to assess risk of breast cancer. N Y Times Web. 1996;A1:A15. - PubMed
    1. Abul-Husn NS, Manickam K, Jones LK, Wright EA, Hartzel DN, Gonzaga-Jauregui C, et al. Genetic identification of familial hypercholesterolemia within a single U.S. health care system. Science. 2016;354(6319):aaf7000. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf7000. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Grzymski JJ, Elhanan G, Morales Rosado JA, Smith E, Schlauch KA, Read R, et al. Population genetic screening efficiently identifies carriers of autosomal dominant diseases. Nat Med. 2020;26(8):1235–1239. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-0982-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Manickam K, Buchanan AH, Schwartz MLB, Hallquist MLG, Williams JL, Rahm AK, et al. Exome sequencing-based screening for BRCA1/2 expected pathogenic variants among adult biobank participants. JAMA Netw Open. 2018;1(5):e182140. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.2140. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources