Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Oct;103(10):e3784.
doi: 10.1002/ecy.3784. Epub 2022 Jul 24.

Plant responses to soil biota depend on precipitation history, plant diversity, and productivity

Affiliations

Plant responses to soil biota depend on precipitation history, plant diversity, and productivity

Seth Lundell et al. Ecology. 2022 Oct.

Abstract

Soil biota are critical drivers of plant growth, population dynamics, and community structure and thus have wide-ranging effects on ecosystem function. Interactions between plants and soil biota are complex, however, and can depend on the diversity and productivity of the plant community and environmental conditions. Plant-soil biota interactions may be especially important during stressful periods, such as drought, when plants can gain great benefits from beneficial biota but may be susceptible to antagonists. How soil biota respond to drought is also important and can influence plant growth following drought and leave legacies that affect future plant responses to soil biota and further drought. To explore how drought legacies and plant community context influence plant growth responses to soil biota and further drought, we collected soils from 12 grasslands varying in plant diversity and productivity where precipitation was experimentally reduced. We used these soils as inoculum in a growth chamber experiment testing how precipitation history (ambient or reduced) and soil biota (live or sterile soil inoculum) mediate plant growth and drought responses within an experimental plant community. We also tested whether these responses differed with the diversity and productivity of the community where the soil was collected. Plant growth responses to soil biota were positive when inoculated with soils from less diverse and productive plant communities and became negative as the diversity and productivity of the conditioning community increased. At low diversity, however, positive soil biota effects on plant growth were eliminated if precipitation had been reduced in the field, suggesting that diversity loss may heighten climate change sensitivity. Differences among species within the experimental community in their responses to soil biota and drought suggest that species benefitting from less drought sensitive soil biota may be able to compensate for some of this loss of productivity. Regardless of the plant species and soil origin, further drought eliminated any effects of soil biota on plant growth. Consequently, soil biota may be unable to buffer the effects of drought on primary productivity or other ecosystem functions as extreme events increase in frequency.

Keywords: bacteria; community structure; drought; extreme events; global climate change; grasses and grasslands; legacy effects; mycorrhizas; pathogens; soil microbes; species richness; stability.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Allison, S. D., and M. L. Goulden. 2017. “Consequences of Drought Tolerance Traits for Microbial Decomposition in the DEMENT Model.” Soil Biology and Biochemistry 107: 104-13.
    1. Allison, S. D., and J. B. H. Martiny. 2008. “Resistance, Resilience, and Redundancy in Microbial Communities.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 105: 11512-9.
    1. Batbaatar, A., C. N. Carlyle, E. W. Bork, S. X. Chang, and J. F. Cahill, Jr. 2021. “Multi-Year Drought Alters Plant Species Composition More than Productivity across Northern Temperate Grasslands.” Journal of Ecology 110: 197-209.
    1. Bates, D., M. Mächler, B. Bolker, and S. Walker. 2015. “Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4.” Journal of Statistical Software 67: 48.
    1. Baxendale, C., K. H. Orwin, F. Poly, T. Pommier, and R. D. Bardgett. 2014. “Are Plant-Soil Feedback Responses Explained by Plant Traits?” New Phytologist 204: 408-23.

Publication types