Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Mar 1;21(1):1105-1118.
doi: 10.1007/s40200-022-01013-3. eCollection 2022 Jun.

The association of dietary insulin load and index with the risk of cancer and cancer mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Farshad Teymoori  1   2 , Ebrahim Mokhtari  1 , Alireza Bahrami  3 , Hossein Farhadnejad  1 , Mina Azadi  2 , Milad Nazarzadeh  4 , Mohammadreza Vafa  2   5
Affiliations
Review

The association of dietary insulin load and index with the risk of cancer and cancer mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Farshad Teymoori et al. J Diabetes Metab Disord. .

Abstract

Purpose: Insulin levels play an important role in cancer development. However, the link between an insulinogenic diet and cancer is still unclear. Therefore, we performed a systematic review with meta-analysis to investigate the association between dietary insulin index (II) and load (IL) with cancer risk and mortality.

Methods: A comprehensive search between electronic databases (Web of Science, PubMed/Medline, Scopus, and Google Scholar) was conducted to identify relevant studies up to January 2022. The relative risks (RR) and Odds ratios (OR) were extracted from eligible studies, and meta-analysis was performed to calculate the pooled effect size.

Result: 12 papers including 14 studies (10 cohorts and 4 case-control) were included for the meta-analysis. Among them, 10 studies reported effect size for the risk of cancer, and 4 studies reported effect size for cancer mortality. We observed no significant association between II and IL with cancer overall (RRII: 1.03, 95%CI: 0.91-1.17, RRIL: 1.16, 95%CI: 0.94-1.42) and in cohort studies, however, in case-control studies was related with higher odds of cancer (ORII: 2.30, 95%CI: 1.21-4.38, ORIL: 2.57, 95%CI: 1.64-4.02). Higher II and IL scores were associated with the increased risk of total (RRII: 1.29, 95%CI: 1.02-1.63) and (RRIL: 1.39, 95%CI: 1.06-1.83) and colorectal cancer mortality (RRII: 1.29, 95%CI: 1.13-1.48) and (RRIL: 1.37, 95%CI: 1.18-1.60).

Conclusion: Higher dietary II and IL were not associated with cancer risk in overall and cohort studies, whereas related with a higher risk of cancer in case-control studies. We observed a significant positive relation of II and IL with cancer mortality, especially CRC mortality.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40200-022-01013-3.

Keywords: Cancer; Cancer mortality; Insulin index; Insulin load; Meta-analysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interestThe authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow diagram of selection of the published studies
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Forest plot for the association between dietary insulin index and the risk of cancer disease in adults, expressed as a comparison between highest and lowest categories of dietary insulin index. The diamond represents pooled estimates and its width shows a corresponding 95% CI from the random-effects analysis
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Forest plot for the association between dietary insulin load and the risk of cancer disease in adults, expressed as a comparison between highest and lowest categories of dietary insulin load. The diamond represents pooled estimates and its width shows a corresponding 95% CI from the random-effects analysis
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Forest plot for the association between dietary insulin index and the risk of cancer mortality in adults. The diamond represents pooled estimates and its width shows a corresponding 95% CI from the random-effects analysis
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Forest plot for the association between dietary insulin load and the risk of cancer mortality in adults. The diamond represents pooled estimates and its width shows a corresponding 95% CI from the random-effects analysis
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Jemal A, Torre LA. The global burden of cancer. The American Cancer SocietyLs principles of oncology: prevention to survivorship. Hoboken: Wiley; 2018. pp. 33–44.
    1. Poirier AE, Ruan Y, Walter SD, Franco EL, Villeneuve PJ, King WD, Volesky KD, O’Sullivan DE, Friedenreich CM, Brenner DR. The future burden of cancer in Canada: long-term cancer incidence projections 2013–2042. Cancer Epidemiol. 2019;59:199–207. - PubMed
    1. López-Suárez A. Burden of cancer attributable to obesity, type 2 diabetes and associated risk factors. Metabolism. 2019;92:136–146. - PubMed
    1. Prescott J, Bao Y, Viswanathan AN, Giovannucci EL, Hankinson SE, De Vivo I. Dietary insulin index and insulin load in relation to endometrial cancer risk in the Nurses' Health Study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2014;23(8):1512–1520. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Giovannucci E. Metabolic syndrome, hyperinsulinemia, and colon cancer: a review. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007;86(3):836S–842S. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources