Motivational Interviewing to Encourage Agricultural Producers' Use of Hearing Protection Devices: A Mixed-Method Feasibility Study
- PMID: 35673706
- PMCID: PMC9511903
- DOI: 10.1177/21650799221096992
Motivational Interviewing to Encourage Agricultural Producers' Use of Hearing Protection Devices: A Mixed-Method Feasibility Study
Abstract
Background: Workers in production agriculture are frequently exposed to high noise levels and face unique barriers to implementing hearing protection, leading to occupational hearing loss. Motivational interviewing is a promising approach to assist workers in preserving their hearing.
Methods: This pilot study used a mixed-method approach to evaluate the feasibility of an innovative motivational interviewing intervention for agricultural producers from February to May 2021. Qualitative data included coaches' and participants' comments and were coded using a structural coding approach. Quantitative data included Likert-type-style responses given by participants in a post-intervention survey. Data types were then integrated.
Results: Sixteen participants were recruited during the 4-month pilot. Participants' satisfaction scores averaged above six on a 7-point scale for all satisfaction questions. Implementation factors included the intervention's flexibility, services provided by the coaches beyond motivational interviewing, and difficulties with recruitment.
Conclusions/applications to practice: This motivational interviewing intervention was highly acceptable to participants, but factors affecting implementation may challenge scalability.
Keywords: farmers; hearing loss; motivational interviewing; occupational health.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of Interest
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Effectiveness of Motivational Interviewing in Increasing Use of Hearing Protection Devices Among Agricultural Producers.Workplace Health Saf. 2023 Mar;71(3):130-136. doi: 10.1177/21650799221139996. Epub 2023 Jan 13. Workplace Health Saf. 2023. PMID: 36636899
-
Behavioral intervention grounded in motivational interviewing and behavioral economics shows promise with Black and English-speaking Latino persons living with HIV with unsuppressed HIV viral load in New York City: A mixed methods pilot study.Front Public Health. 2022 Sep 15;10:916224. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.916224. eCollection 2022. Front Public Health. 2022. PMID: 36187648 Free PMC article.
-
Feasibility of training nurses in motivational interviewing to improve patient experience in mental health inpatient rehabilitation: a pilot study.J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2017 May;24(4):221-231. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12382. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2017. PMID: 28248447
-
Feasibility of conducting a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effect of motivational interviewing on hearing-aid use.Int J Audiol. 2016;55(3):149-56. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2015.1074733. Epub 2015 Sep 2. Int J Audiol. 2016. PMID: 26328620 Clinical Trial.
-
The impact of pharmacy care and motivational interviewing on improving medication adherence in patients with cardiovascular diseases: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials.Int J Clin Pract. 2021 Nov;75(11):e14457. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.14457. Epub 2021 Jul 1. Int J Clin Pract. 2021. PMID: 34105858
References
-
- Basner M, Brink M, Bristow A, de Kluizenaar Y, Finegold L, Hong J, Janssen SA, Klaeboe R, Leroux T, Liebl A, Matsui T, Schwela D, Sliwinska-Kowalska M, & Sörqvist P (2015). ICBEN review of research on the Biological Effects of Noise 2011–2014. Noise & Health, 17(75), 57–82. 10.4103/1463-1741.153373 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Creswell JW (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach (4th ed.). SAGE.
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources