Acquisition of robotic surgical skills does not require laparoscopic training: a randomized controlled trial
- PMID: 35676543
- DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09118-9
Acquisition of robotic surgical skills does not require laparoscopic training: a randomized controlled trial
Abstract
Background: Robotic surgery is a valid option for minimally invasive surgery in most surgical specialties. However, the need to master laparoscopy is questionable before starting specific training in robotic surgery. We compared the development of basic robotic surgery skills between individuals randomized to train in conventional, laparoscopic, or robotic skills.
Methods: We conducted a single-centered, single-blinded randomized trial. Medical students were randomly assigned to 20 h of conventional, laparoscopic, or robotic surgical training. Students with previous surgical experience were excluded. Participants were evaluated pre- and post-training on the dV-Trainer robotic surgical simulator with the following exercises: Camera Targeting 1, Peg Board 1, Ring and Rail 1, and Ring and Rail 2.
Results: Sixty-six students were randomly assigned to each training group. Eight individuals did not complete the study (2 in the conventional group, 3 in the laparoscopic group, and 3 in the robotic group). All groups demonstrated significant improvement in the composite score and in each task following the training period (p < 0.001). No differences were seen between the conventional and laparoscopic groups in the composite score or individual tasks. The robotic group showed greater improvement in number of errors, economy of motion, workspace utilization, and time for completion compared to the other groups. The laparoscopic group showed improved camera manipulation skills compared to the conventional group, while the conventional group showed improved errors and economy of motion compared to the laparoscopic group.
Conclusion: There was no difference in the acquisition of basic robotic surgical skills between individuals trained in basic conventional or laparoscopic surgical skills. We believe surgeons mastery in laparoscopy is not needed before initiating robotic surgical training. However, basic principles of laparoscopy remain applicable to robotic surgery. Future studies should compare transferability of conventional and laparoscopic training to robotic skills in the operating room.
Keywords: Laparoscopic surgery; Robotic surgery; Surgical education; Surgical simulation; Surgical training.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Similar articles
-
Retention of laparoscopic and robotic skills among medical students: a randomized controlled trial.Surg Endosc. 2017 Aug;31(8):3306-3312. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5363-2. Epub 2017 Jan 11. Surg Endosc. 2017. PMID: 28078455 Clinical Trial.
-
Laparoscopic and robotic skills are transferable in a simulation setting: a randomized controlled trial.Surg Endosc. 2017 Aug;31(8):3279-3285. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5359-y. Epub 2016 Dec 6. Surg Endosc. 2017. PMID: 27924388 Clinical Trial.
-
Does Previous Laparoscopic Experience Influence Basic Robotic Surgical Skills?J Surg Educ. 2018 Jul-Aug;75(4):1075-1081. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.11.005. Epub 2017 Nov 28. J Surg Educ. 2018. PMID: 29191757
-
Current state of virtual reality simulation in robotic surgery training: a review.Surg Endosc. 2016 Jun;30(6):2169-78. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4517-y. Epub 2015 Aug 25. Surg Endosc. 2016. PMID: 26304107 Review.
-
Da Vinci© Skills Simulator™: is an early selection of talented console surgeons possible?J Robot Surg. 2016 Dec;10(4):289-296. doi: 10.1007/s11701-016-0616-6. Epub 2016 Jun 22. J Robot Surg. 2016. PMID: 27334771 Review.
Cited by
-
Towards identifying a learning curve for robotic abdominal wall reconstruction: a cumulative sum analysis.Hernia. 2023 Jun;27(3):671-676. doi: 10.1007/s10029-023-02794-z. Epub 2023 May 9. Hernia. 2023. PMID: 37160504
-
A new mixed reality tool for training in minimally invasive robotic-assisted surgery.Health Inf Sci Syst. 2023 Aug 2;11(1):34. doi: 10.1007/s13755-023-00238-7. eCollection 2023 Dec. Health Inf Sci Syst. 2023. PMID: 37545486 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Buchs NC, Addeo P, Bianco FM, Gorodner V, Ayloo SM, Elli EF, Oberholzer J, Benedetti E, Giulianotti PC (2012) Perioperative risk assessment in robotic general surgery: lessons learned from 884 cases at a single institution. Arch Surg-Chicago 147:701–708. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.2012.496 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Giulianotti PC, Addeo P, Buchs NC, Ayloo SM, Bianco FM (2011) Robotic extended pancreatectomy with vascular resection for locally advanced pancreatic tumors. Pancreas 40:1264–1270. https://doi.org/10.1097/mpa.0b013e318220e3a4 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Giulianotti PC, Coratti A, Sbrana F, Addeo P, Bianco FM, Buchs NC, Annechiarico M, Benedetti E (2011) Robotic liver surgery: results for 70 resections. Surgery 149:29–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2010.04.002 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Buchs NC, Addeo P, Bianco FM, Ayloo S, Benedetti E, Giulianotti PC (2011) Robotic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy: a comparative study at a single institution. World J Surg 35:2739–2746. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-011-1276-3 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Trinh Q-D, Sammon J, Sun M, Ravi P, Ghani KR, Bianchi M, Jeong W, Shariat SF, Hansen J, Schmitges J, Jeldres C, Rogers CG, Peabody JO, Montorsi F, Menon M, Karakiewicz PI (2012) Perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy compared with open radical prostatectomy: results from the nationwide inpatient sample. Eur Urol 61:679–685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2011.12.027 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources