Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2022 Oct;24(10):2017-2026.
doi: 10.1111/dom.14789. Epub 2022 Jul 21.

Acute effects on glucose tolerance by neprilysin inhibition in patients with type 2 diabetes

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Acute effects on glucose tolerance by neprilysin inhibition in patients with type 2 diabetes

Nicolai J Wewer Albrechtsen et al. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2022 Oct.

Abstract

Aims: Sacubitril/valsartan is a neprilysin-inhibitor/angiotensin II receptor blocker used for the treatment of heart failure. Recently, a post-hoc analysis of a 3-year randomized controlled trial showed improved glycaemic control with sacubitril/valsartan in patients with heart failure and type 2 diabetes. We previously reported that sacubitril/valsartan combined with a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor increases active glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) in healthy individuals. We now hypothesized that administration of sacubitril/valsartan with or without a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor would lower postprandial glucose concentrations (primary outcome) in patients with type 2 diabetes via increased active GLP-1.

Methods: We performed a crossover trial in 12 patients with obesity and type 2 diabetes. A mixed meal was ingested following five respective interventions: (a) a single dose of sacubitril/valsartan; (b) sitagliptin; (c) sacubitril/valsartan + sitagliptin; (d) control (no treatment); and (e) valsartan alone. Glucose, gut and pancreatic hormone responses were measured.

Results: Postprandial plasma glucose increased by 57% (incremental area under the curve 0-240 min) (p = .0003) and increased peak plasma glucose by 1.7 mM (95% CI: 0.6-2.9) (p = .003) after sacubitril/valsartan compared with control, whereas postprandial glucose levels did not change significantly after sacubitril/valsartan + sitagliptin. Glucagon, GLP-1 and C-peptide concentrations increased after sacubitril/valsartan, but insulin and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide did not change.

Conclusions: The glucose-lowering effects of long-term sacubitril/valsartan treatment reported in patients with heart failure and type 2 diabetes may not depend on changes in entero-pancreatic hormones. Neprilysin inhibition results in hyperglucagonaemia and this may explain the worsen glucose tolerance observed in this study.

Clinicaltrials: gov (NCT03893526).

Keywords: GLP-1; clinical trial; drug mechanism; glucagon; glycaemic control.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

NJWA has received speaker fees from MSD as subsidiary of MERCK and Mercodia, research support from Novo Nordisk A/S and Mercodia. CFD has received consultancy/lecture fees from companies with an interest in developing and marketing incretin‐based therapies for treatment of type 2 diabetes (Boehringer Ingelheim, Lilly, Merck/MSD, Novo Nordisk). Spouse holds stock in Merck/MSD. JJH and LLG are members of advisory boards for Novo Nordisk A/S and has received lecture fees from the same company. Other authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
(A,B) Glucose, (C,D) insulin and (E,F) C‐peptide responses to a standardized mixed meal test, during control (black line and circle), sacubitril/valsartan treatment (red line and squire), sitagliptin treatment (blue line and upward triangle), sacubitril/valsartan plus sitagliptin treatment (orange line and downward triangle). (A,C,E) Data are shown as mean ± SEM. (B,D,F) Calculated iAUC0‐240 min, control (black and white box), sacubitril/valsartan treatment (red box), sitagliptin treatment (blue box), sacubitril/valsartan plus sitagliptin treatment (orange box). Data are means ± Tukey whiskers with outliers shown as symbols. *p < .05, ***p < .001 by iAUC0‐240 using a one‐way ANOVA correcting for multiple testing by Sidak algorithm. N = 12 (male subjects). iAUC, incremental area under the curve
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Plasma concentrations of (A,B) total glucagon‐like peptide‐1 (GLP‐1), (C,D) intact GLP‐1 and (E,F) glucagon during a standardized mixed meal test. Control (black line and circle), sacubitril/valsartan treatment (red line and squire), sitagliptin treatment (blue line and upward triangle), sacubitril/valsartan plus sitagliptin treatment (orange line and downward triangle). (A,C,E) Data are shown as mean ± SEM. (B,D,F) Calculated iAUC0‐240 min control (black and white box), sacubitril/valsartan treatment (red box), sitagliptin treatment (blue box), sacubitril/valsartan plus sitagliptin treatment (orange box). Data are means ± Tukey whiskers with outliers shown as symbols. *p < .05 by iAUC0‐240 using one‐way ANOVA correcting for multiple testing by Sidak algorithm. N = 12 (male subjects). iAUC, incremental area under the curve
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Plasma concentrations of (A,B) total glucose‐dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and (C,D) intact GIP during a standardized mixed meal test. Control (black line and circle), sacubitril/valsartan treatment (red line and square), sitagliptin treatment (blue line and upward triangle), sacubitril/valsartan plus sitagliptin treatment (orange line and downward triangle). (A,C) Data are shown as mean ± SEM. (B,D) Calculated iAUC0‐240 min, control (black and white box), sacubitril/valsartan treatment (red box), sitagliptin treatment (blue box), sacubitril/valsartan plus sitagliptin treatment (orange box). Data are means ± Tukey whiskers with outliers shown as symbols. **p < .01 by iAUC0‐240 using one‐way ANOVA correcting for multiple testing by Sidak algorithm. N = 12 (male subjects). iAUC, incremental area under the curve

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. McMurray JJ, Packer M, Desai AS, et al. Angiotensin‐neprilysin inhibition versus enalapril in heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(11):993‐1004. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1409077 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Seferovic JP, Claggett B, Seidelmann SB, et al. Effect of sacubitril/valsartan versus enalapril on glycaemic control in patients with heart failure and diabetes: a post‐hoc analysis from the PARADIGM‐HF trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017;5(5):333‐340. doi:10.1016/s2213-8587(17)30087-6 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Esser N, Zraika S. Neprilysin inhibition: a new therapeutic option for type 2 diabetes? Diabetologia. 2019;62(7):1113‐1122. doi:10.1007/s00125-019-4889-y - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Packer M. Augmentation of glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor signalling by neprilysin inhibition: potential implications for patients with heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail. 2018;20(6):973‐977. doi:10.1002/ejhf.1185 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Erdös EG, Skidgel RA. Neutral endopeptidase 24.11 (enkephalinase) and related regulators of peptide hormones. FASEB J. 1989;3(2):145‐151. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data