Conversations About End-of-Life Decisions in Neonatology: Do Doctors and Parents Implement Shared Decision-Making?
- PMID: 35676897
- PMCID: PMC9168986
- DOI: 10.3389/fped.2022.897014
Conversations About End-of-Life Decisions in Neonatology: Do Doctors and Parents Implement Shared Decision-Making?
Abstract
Introduction: Advances in perinatal medicine have contributed to significantly improved survival of newborns. While some infants die despite extensive medical treatment, a larger proportion dies following medical decision-making (MDM). International guidelines about end-of-life (EOL) MDM for neonates unify in their recommendation for shared decision-making (SDM) between doctors and parents. Yet, we do not know to what extent SDM is realized in neonatal practice.
Objective: We aim at examining to which extent SDM is implemented in the NICU setting.
Methods: By means of Qualitative Content Analysis, audio-recorded conversations between neonatologists and parents were analyzed. We used a framework by de Vos that was used to analyze similar conversations on the PICU.
Results: In total we analyzed 17 conversations with 23 parents of 12 NICU patients. SDM was adopted only to a small extent in neonatal EOL-MDM conversations. The extent of sharing decreased considerably over the stages of SDM. The neonatologists suggested finding a decision together with parents, while at the same time seeking parents' agreement for the intended decision to forgo life-sustaining treatment.
Conclusions: Since SDM was only realized to a small extent in the NICU under study, we propose evaluating how parents in this unit experience the EOL-MDM process and whether they feel their involvement in the process acceptable and beneficial. If parents evaluate their involvement in the current approach beneficial, the need for implementation of SDM to the full extent, as suggested in the guidelines, may need to be critically re-assessed.
Keywords: conversations; end-of-life; neonatology; parents; shared decision-making.
Copyright © 2022 Schouten, Beyer, Flemmer, de Vos and Kuehlmeyer.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Similar articles
-
"We Absolutely Had the Impression That It Was Our Decision"-A Qualitative Study with Parents of Critically Ill Infants Who Participated in End-of-Life Decision Making.Children (Basel). 2022 Dec 26;10(1):46. doi: 10.3390/children10010046. Children (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36670597 Free PMC article.
-
Uncertainty and probability in neonatal end-of-life decision-making: analysing real-time conversations between healthcare professionals and families of critically ill newborns.BMC Palliat Care. 2023 May 3;22(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s12904-023-01170-z. BMC Palliat Care. 2023. PMID: 37138282 Free PMC article.
-
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12. Early Hum Dev. 2020. PMID: 33036834
-
Communication with parents concerning withholding or withdrawing of life-sustaining interventions in neonatology.Semin Perinatol. 2014 Feb;38(1):38-46. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2013.07.007. Semin Perinatol. 2014. PMID: 24468568 Review.
-
Is Shared Decision Making for End-of-Life Decisions Associated With Better Outcomes as Compared to Other Forms of Decision Making? A Systematic Literature Review.MDM Policy Pract. 2016 Jul 7;1(1):2381468316642237. doi: 10.1177/2381468316642237. eCollection 2016 Jul-Dec. MDM Policy Pract. 2016. PMID: 30288399 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
"We Absolutely Had the Impression That It Was Our Decision"-A Qualitative Study with Parents of Critically Ill Infants Who Participated in End-of-Life Decision Making.Children (Basel). 2022 Dec 26;10(1):46. doi: 10.3390/children10010046. Children (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36670597 Free PMC article.
-
Do Treatment Choices by Artificial Intelligence Correspond to Reality? Retrospective Comparative Research with Necrotizing Enterocolitis as a Use Case.Med Decis Making. 2025 May;45(4):449-461. doi: 10.1177/0272989X251324530. Epub 2025 Mar 12. Med Decis Making. 2025. PMID: 40071849 Free PMC article.
-
Public Attitudes Toward Ethics and Practices in End-of-Life Decision-Making for Neonates.JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jan 2;7(1):e2353264. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.53264. JAMA Netw Open. 2024. PMID: 38270948 Free PMC article.
-
Opportunities and Challenges of Prognostic Models for Extremely Preterm Infants.Children (Basel). 2023 Oct 21;10(10):1712. doi: 10.3390/children10101712. Children (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37892375 Free PMC article.
References
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources