Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May-Jun;12(3):899-907.
doi: 10.1016/j.jceh.2021.09.019. Epub 2021 Sep 28.

Fractional Excretion of Sodium and Urea in Differentiating Acute Kidney Injury Phenotypes in Decompensated Cirrhosis

Affiliations

Fractional Excretion of Sodium and Urea in Differentiating Acute Kidney Injury Phenotypes in Decompensated Cirrhosis

Yashavanth H S Gowda et al. J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2022 May-Jun.

Abstract

Background: Prerenal acute kidney injury (prerenal AKI), hepatorenal syndrome (HRS-AKI), and acute tubular necrosis (ATN-AKI) are the various phenotypes of acute kidney injury, which are described in decompensated cirrhosis. It has therapeutic and prognostic implications. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic utility of fractional excretion of sodium and urea (FENa and FEUrea) for differentiating AKI phenotypes.

Methods: A prospective analysis was performed in 200 patients with decompensated cirrhosis with AKI to derive receiver operating curve, optimal cut-off, sensitivity, and specificity. These findings were validated in an independent cohort (n = 50) to differentiate ATN-AKI, HRS-AKI, and prerenal AKI.

Results: The incidence of prerenal AKI, HRS-AKI, and ATN-AKI were 37.5%, 34%, and 28.5% in the derivation cohort and 28%, 38%, and 34% in the validation cohort respectively. The median FENa was significantly different in various phenotypes of AKI in the derivation and validation cohort (P 0.001); FEUrea was significantly different in the derivation cohort (P 0.0001), not in the validation cohort (P 0.106). The AUC for FENa (cut-off, sensitivity/specificity) was 86.6% (0.567, 89/71) and for FEUrea was 60.3% (34.73, 70/58) for ATN-AKI vs. non-ATN-AKI. The area under the curve for FENa to differentiate between HRS-AKI vs. non-HRS-AKI was 74.5%. FEUrea could not differentiate HRS-AKI vs. non-HRS-AKI (AUC 60.4%) satisfactorily. FENa and FEUrea were unable to differentiate between prerenal AKI and HRS-AKI (AUC <70%).

Conclusion: Among cirrhotics FENa at admission is a simple, commonly available clinical tool that can be used to differentiate structural AKI from prerenal AKI and HRS-AKI. The newly derived lowered cut-off value of FENa makes the diagnosis of ATN-AKI easier, faster and thus obviates the need for extensive workup in a significant proportion of patients. FENa appears better than FEUrea in decompensated cirrhosis with AKI.

Keywords: AKI, Acute Kidney Injury; ATN–AKI, Acute Tubular Necrosis – Acute Kidney Injury; AUC, Area Under Curve; FENa, Fractional Excretion of Sodium; FEUrea, Fractional Excretion of Urea; HRS–AKI, Hepato Renal Syndrome Acute Kidney Injury; ICA, International Club of Ascites; IL-18, Interleukin-18; IQR, Interquartile range; KIM-1, Kidney Injury Molecule – 1; L-FABP, Liver Type Fatty Acid-Binding Protein; NGAL, Neutrophil Gelatinase – Associated lipocalin; Prerenal AKI, Prerenal Acute Kidney Injury; ROC, Receiver Operating Curve; acute kidney injury; cirrhosis; fractional excretion of sodium; fractional excretion of urea; hepatorenal syndrome.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Consort diagram.
Figure 2
Figure 2
ROC ATN vs Non ATN.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Algorithmic approach to cirrhotic with AKI using FENA.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Belcher J.M., Garcia-Tsao G., Sanyal A.J., et al. Association of AKI with mortality and complications in hospitalized patients with cirrhosis. Hepatology. 2013;57:753–762. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Velez J.C.Q., Therapondos G., Juncos L.A. Reappraising the spectrum of AKI and hepatorenal syndrome in patients with cirrhosis. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2020;16:137–155. - PubMed
    1. Shetty S., Nagaraju S.P., Shenoy S., et al. Acute kidney injury in patients with cirrhosis of liver: clinical profile and predictors of outcome. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2018;37:248–254. - PubMed
    1. Angeli P., Garcia-Tsao G., Nadim M.K., et al. News in pathophysiology, definition and classification of hepatorenal syndrome: a step beyond the International Club of Ascites (ICA) consensus document. J Hepatol. 2019;71:811–822. - PubMed
    1. Angeli P., Gines P., Wong F., et al. Diagnosis and management of acute kidney injury in patients with cirrhosis: revised consensus recommendations of the International Club of Ascites. J Hepatol. 2015;62:968–974. - PubMed