Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 May;24(2):189-206.
doi: 10.5853/jos.2022.01102. Epub 2022 May 31.

Predictors of Therapy Response in Chronic Aphasia: Building a Foundation for Personalized Aphasia Therapy

Affiliations
Review

Predictors of Therapy Response in Chronic Aphasia: Building a Foundation for Personalized Aphasia Therapy

Sigfus Kristinsson et al. J Stroke. 2022 May.

Abstract

Chronic aphasia, a devastating impairment of language, affects up to a third of stroke survivors. Speech and language therapy has consistently been shown to improve language function in prior clinical trials, but few clinicially applicable predictors of individual therapy response have been identified to date. Consequently, clinicians struggle substantially with prognostication in the clinical management of aphasia. A rising prevalence of aphasia, in particular in younger populations, has emphasized the increasing demand for a personalized approach to aphasia therapy, that is, therapy aimed at maximizing language recovery of each individual with reference to evidence-based clinical recommendations. In this narrative review, we discuss the current state of the literature with respect to commonly studied predictors of therapy response in aphasia. In particular, we focus our discussion on biographical, neuropsychological, and neurobiological predictors, and emphasize limitations of the literature, summarize consistent findings, and consider how the research field can better support the development of personalized aphasia therapy. In conclusion, a review of the literature indicates that future research efforts should aim to recruit larger samples of people with aphasia, including by establishing multisite aphasia research centers.

Keywords: Aphasia; Language therapy; Stroke.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mesulam MM. In: Concise Encyclopedia of Brain and Language. Whitaker HA, editor. Oxford, UK: Elsevier Ltd; 2010. Aphasia, sudden and progressive; pp. 49–53.
    1. Watila MM, Balarabe SA. Factors predicting post-stroke aphasia recovery. J Neurol Sci. 2015;352:12–18. - PubMed
    1. Code C, Papathanasiou I, Rubio-Bruno S, Cabana Mde L, Villanueva MM, Haaland-Johansen L, et al. International patterns of the public awareness of aphasia. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2016;51:276–284. - PubMed
    1. Flowers HL, Skoretz SA, Silver FL, Rochon E, Fang J, Flamand-Roze C, et al. Poststroke aphasia frequency, recovery, and outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016;97:2188–2201. - PubMed
    1. Brady MC, Kelly H, Godwin J, Enderby P, Campbell P. Speech and language therapy for aphasia following stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;2016:CD000425. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources