Dissemination of a successful dementia care program: Lessons to facilitate spread of innovations
- PMID: 35678747
- PMCID: PMC9489616
- DOI: 10.1111/jgs.17900
Dissemination of a successful dementia care program: Lessons to facilitate spread of innovations
Abstract
Background: Despite the effectiveness of innovations to improve the care of persons with dementia, there has been limited diffusion of these into widespread clinical practice. We aimed to identify common barriers and address them directly in the initial phase of dissemination of a successful dementia care program.
Methods: Description of and early experience with a dissemination strategy of the UCLA Alzheimer's and Dementia Care Program to health care systems nationwide. We measured site-identified goals for the program and indicators of success, number of adopting sites, and participants in their programs.
Results: From January 2019 to December 2021, 80 sites expressed interest in adopting the program, 14 (18%) sites adopted it, and 10 of these sites have begun caring for patients. Another 4 sites have implemented the program as part of a randomized clinical trial. To date, over 1690 persons living with dementia and their caregivers have received Alzheimer's and Dementia Care (ADC) care at 14 adopting sites. Key lessons from the early dissemination efforts include the importance of identifying a strong product champion at the adopting site, creating a business case for adoption, training of clinical staff and adapting the model to fit local cultures and workflow, as well as recognizing the likely long length of time needed for the decision to adopt and implementation process.
Conclusions: Despite many obstacles to dissemination, with local champions and technical assistance, successful innovations in dementia care can be implemented in diverse health systems. The ability to adopt sites to bring the program to full scale and achieve comparable outcomes to the original program remains to be determined.
Keywords: Alzheimer's disease; advance practice providers; caregiver burden; co-management; collaborative care; dementia.
© 2022 The American Geriatrics Society.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of Interest: None
Figures



Comment in
-
Robotic-assisted collaborative care.J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022 Sep;70(9):2484-2486. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17934. Epub 2022 Jul 4. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022. PMID: 35781250 No abstract available.
References
-
- Hanney SR, Castle-Clarke S, Grant J, et al. How long does biomedical research take? Studying the time taken between biomedical and health research and its translation into products, policy, and practice. Health Res Policy Syst. 2015;13:1. Published 2015 Jan 1. doi:10.1186/1478-4505-13-1 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Reuben DB, Evertson LC, Wenger NS, et al. The University of California at Los Angeles Alzheimer’s and Dementia Care program for comprehensive, coordinated, patient-centered care: preliminary data. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2013. Dec;61(12):2214–2218. doi: 10.1111/jgs.12562. Epub 2013 Dec 3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Berwick DM, Nolan TW, Whittington J. The Triple Aim: Care, Health, And Cost Health Affairs, 27, no.3 (2008):759–769 - PubMed