Simultaneously Developing Interventions for Low-/Middle-Income and High-Income Settings: Considerations and Opportunities
- PMID: 35679613
- PMCID: PMC10028230
- DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnac079
Simultaneously Developing Interventions for Low-/Middle-Income and High-Income Settings: Considerations and Opportunities
Abstract
Most older adults reside in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) but most research dollars spent on interventions to improve the lives of older adults are awarded to researchers in high-income countries (HICs). One approach to improve the implementation of evidence-based innovations for older adults in LMICs is designing interventions that are relevant to LMICs and HICs simultaneously. We propose that researchers in HICs could partner with stakeholders in an LMIC throughout the intervention design process to better position their intervention for the implementation in that LMIC. We provide an example study from an adaptation of the Resources for Enhancing Caregiver Health II in Vietnam, which did not use this strategy but may have benefited from this strategy. We then turn to several considerations that are important for researchers to contemplate when incorporating this strategy. Finally, we explore incentives for creating interventions that are relevant to both HICs and LMICs for funders, intervention designers, and intervention receivers. Although this is not the only strategy to bring interventions to LMICs, it may represent another tool in researchers' toolboxes to help expedite the implementation of efficacious interventions in LMICs.
Keywords: Health equity; Implementation science; International collaborations; Research translation; Teams/interdisciplinary/multidisciplinary.
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Conflict of interest statement
None declared.
References
-
- Acquadro, C., Conway, K., Hareendran, A., & Aaronson, N.; European Regulatory Issues and Quality of Life Assessment (ERIQA) Group. (2008). Literature review of methods to translate health-related quality of life questionnaires for use in multinational clinical trials. Value in Health, 11(3), 509–521. doi:10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00292.x - DOI - PubMed
-
- Adam, T., Akuffo, H., Carter, J. G., Charat, Z., Cheetham, M. J., Crisafulli, A., Danielson, C. M., Gunning, J., Haugen, B., Jajkowicz, D., Kay, S., Kilmarx, P. H., López, J. M., Olesen, O. F., Peñas-Jiménez, I., Tesfagiorgis, K., Wallick, S. K., & Glass, R. I. (2020). World RePORT: A database for mapping biomedical research funding. The Lancet Global Health, 8(1), e27–e29. doi:10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30459-0 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Belle, S. H., Burgio, L., Burns, R., Coon, D., Czaja, S. J., Gallagher-Thompson, D., Gitlin, L. N., Klinger, J., Koepke, K. M., Lee, C. C., Martindale-Adams, J., Nichols, L., Schulz, R., Stahl, S., Stevens, A., Winter, L., & Zhang, S. (2006). Enhancing the quality of life of dementia caregivers from different ethnic or racial groups. Annals of Internal Medicine, 145(10), 727–738. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-145-10-200611210-00005 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
