Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2022 Jun 9;12(6):e057159.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057159.

Patient-reported systemic symptoms in women with silicone breast implants: a descriptive cohort study

Affiliations
Observational Study

Patient-reported systemic symptoms in women with silicone breast implants: a descriptive cohort study

Karlinde Amber Spit et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objective: An unknown portion of women with silicone breast implants (SBI) report development of systemic symptoms, recently named as 'breast implant illness (BII)'. We aim to describe the symptoms and characteristics of women with SBI reporting these systemic symptoms and compare the clinical course of women who chose to keep their implants, to women who had their implants removed.

Design: Observational cohort study.

Setting: Specialised BII out-patient clinic at Amsterdam UMC, the Netherlands, from 2011 to 2020.

Participants: All women presenting to the BII clinic with SBI and systemic symptoms.

Results: 467 women were included for baseline analyses and 398 women for follow-up. Most frequently reported systemic symptoms at baseline included fatigue (88%), arthralgia (71%), morning stiffness (59%), myalgia (48%), cognitive impairment (33%), peripheral neurological symptoms (30%) and lymphadenopathy (22%). Furthermore, 56% reported pre-existing allergies at baseline and positive antinuclear antibodies were observed in 23%. At follow-up with a median of 3.3 years (IQR 2-4), 152 women had their implants removed on clinical grounds. Symptoms improved significantly in 65 women (43%), improved moderately in 37 women (24%), did not change in 37 women (24%) and deteriorated in 13 women (9%). Women who underwent explantation showed more improvement of their systemic symptoms compared with women who did not (OR 2.9, 95% CI 1.3 to 6.2). Additionally, women who underwent explantation within 10 years after implantation improved significantly better than women who got the implants removed after 10 years (p=0.007). Lastly, local symptoms decreased from 75% to 34% after implant removal (p<0.0001).

Conclusion: Most women with SBI who developed systemic symptoms experienced improvement after explantation, especially when removed within 10 years after implantation. Early recognition of the pattern of systemic symptoms in women with SBI is important and implant removal should be considered.

Keywords: breast surgery; plastic & reconstructive surgery; rheumatology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study flow chart.

References

    1. Coroneos CJ, Selber JC, Offodile AC, et al. . US FDA breast implant postapproval studies: long-term outcomes in 99,993 patients. Ann Surg 2019;269:30–6. 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002990 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Watad A, Rosenberg V, Tiosano S, et al. . Silicone breast implants and the risk of autoimmune/rheumatic disorders: a real-world analysis. Int J Epidemiol 2018;47:1846–54. 10.1093/ije/dyy217 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hennekens CH, Lee IM, Cook NR, et al. . Self-reported breast implants and connective-tissue diseases in female health professionals. A retrospective cohort study. JAMA 1996;275:616–21. 10.1001/jama.1996.03530320040032 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jensen B, Bliddal H, Kjøller K, et al. . Rheumatic manifestations in Danish women with silicone breast implants. Clin Rheumatol 2001;20:345–52. 10.1007/s100670170024 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Balk EM, Earley A, Avendano EA, et al. . Long-Term health outcomes in women with silicone gel breast implants: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med 2016;164:164–75. 10.7326/M15-1169 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types