Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jun 2;11(11):1643.
doi: 10.3390/foods11111643.

Chemometric Differentiation of Sole and Plaice Fish Fillets Using Three Near-Infrared Instruments

Affiliations

Chemometric Differentiation of Sole and Plaice Fish Fillets Using Three Near-Infrared Instruments

Nicola Cavallini et al. Foods. .

Abstract

Fish species substitution is one of the most common forms of fraud all over the world, as fish identification can be very challenging for both consumers and experienced inspectors in the case of fish sold as fillets. The difficulties in distinguishing among different species may generate a "grey area" in which mislabelling can occur. Thus, the development of fast and reliable tools able to detect such frauds in the field is of crucial importance. In this study, we focused on the distinction between two flatfish species largely available on the market, namely the Guinean sole (Synaptura cadenati) and European plaice (Pleuronectes platessa), which are very similar looking. Fifty fillets of each species were analysed using three near-infrared (NIR) instruments: the handheld SCiO (Consumer Physics), the portable MicroNIR (VIAVI), and the benchtop MPA (Bruker). PLS-DA classification models were built using the spectral datasets, and all three instruments provided very good results, showing high accuracy: 94.1% for the SCiO and MicroNIR portable instruments, and 90.1% for the MPA benchtop spectrometer. The good classification results of the approach combining NIR spectroscopy, and simple chemometric classification methods suggest great applicability directly in the context of real-world marketplaces, as well as in official control plans.

Keywords: European plaice; Guinean sole; NIR; chemometrics; fish fillets; food fraud.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Fillets of (a) Guinean sole (Synaptura cadenati) and (b) European plaice (Pleuronectes platessa).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Visual representation of the datasets of the study: (ac) the raw data, (df) the SNV-pre-processed data and (gi) the SNV and mean centred (MC) data.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Most relevant PCA scores plots (ac) in terms of SO-PL class separation, and the corresponding loadings plots (df). The three columns refer to, respectively, the (a) SCiO, (b) MicroNIR, and (c) MPA datasets.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Variable importance in projection (VIP) scores of the three PLS-DA classification models: (a) SCiO results, (b) MicroNIR results, and (c) MPA results. The traditional VIP threshold = 1 is represented in red.

References

    1. Reilly A. Overview of Food Fraud in the Fisheries Sector. FAO; Rome, Italy: 2018.
    1. Calosso M.C., Claydon J.A.B., Mariani S., Cawthorn D.M. Global footprint of mislabelled seafood on a small island nation. Biol. Conserv. 2020;245:108557. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108557. - DOI
    1. Donlan C.J., Luque G.M. Exploring the causes of seafood fraud: A meta-analysis on mislabeling and price. Mar. Policy. 2019;100:258–264. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2018.11.022. - DOI
    1. Carvalho D.C., Guedes D., da Gloria Trindade M., Coelho R.M.S., de Lima Araujo P.H. Nationwide Brazilian governmental forensic programme reveals seafood mislabelling trends and rates using DNA barcoding. Fish. Res. 2017;191:30–35. doi: 10.1016/j.fishres.2017.02.021. - DOI
    1. Di Pinto A., Mottola A., Marchetti P., Bottaro M., Terio V., Bozzo G., Bonerba E., Ceci E., Tantillo G. Packaged frozen fishery products: Species identification, mislabeling occurrence and legislative implications. Food Chem. 2016;194:279–283. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.07.135. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources