Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 May 25;12(11):1352.
doi: 10.3390/ani12111352.

The Value of 'Cow Signs' in the Assessment of the Quality of Nutrition on Dairy Farms

Affiliations
Review

The Value of 'Cow Signs' in the Assessment of the Quality of Nutrition on Dairy Farms

Kiro Risto Petrovski et al. Animals (Basel). .

Abstract

The aim of this review is to provide dairy farm advisors, consultants, nutritionists, practitioners, and their dairy farmer clients with an additional toolkit that can be used in the assessment of the quality of their dairy cattle nutrition. Cow signs are behavioral, physiological, and management parameters that can be observed and measured. They are detected by examining and observing the cattle. Other physiological parameters such as fecal scoring, rumen fill, and body condition scoring are also included in 'cow signs'. The assessment should be both qualitative and quantitative; for example, is the cattle individual lame and what is the severity of lameness. The 'diagnosis' of a problem should be based on establishing a farm profile of 'cow signs' and other relevant information. Information gathered through assessment of cow signs should be used as an advisory tool to assist and improve decision making. Cow signs can be used as part of an investigation and or farm audit.

Keywords: appetite; demeanor; fecal digestibility scoring; fecal perineal staining; fecal scoring; obtundancy; prehension; rumen fill scoring; rumination; thirst.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Petrovski K. Cattle signs. In: Cockcroft P.D., editor. Bovine Medicine. 3rd ed. John Wiley & Sons; Hoboken, NJ, USA: 2015. pp. 347–359.
    1. Chalupa W., Galligan D.T., Ferguson J.D. Animal nutrition and management in the 21st century: Dairy cattle. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 1996;58:1–18. doi: 10.1016/0377-8401(95)00869-1. - DOI
    1. Russell J.B., Hespell R.B. Microbial rumen fermentation. J. Dairy Sci. 1981;64:1153–1169. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(81)82694-X. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ingvartsen K.L., Moyes K. Nutrition, immune function and health of dairy cattle. Animal. 2013;7:112–122. doi: 10.1017/S175173111200170X. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Atkinson O. Guide to the rumen health visit. Practice. 2009;31:314–325. doi: 10.1136/inpract.31.7.314. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources