Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 May 27;19(11):6576.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph19116576.

Exploring and Monitoring Privacy, Confidentiality, and Provider Bias in Sexual and Reproductive Health Service Provision to Young People: A Narrative Review

Affiliations
Review

Exploring and Monitoring Privacy, Confidentiality, and Provider Bias in Sexual and Reproductive Health Service Provision to Young People: A Narrative Review

Andrew G Corley et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

Purpose: Poor privacy and confidentiality practices and provider bias are believed to compromise adolescent and young adult sexual and reproductive health service quality. The results of focus group discussions with global youth leaders and sexual and reproductive health implementing organizations indicated that poor privacy and confidentiality practices and provider bias serve as key barriers to care access for the youth.

Methods: A narrative review was conducted to describe how poor privacy and confidentiality practices and provider bias impose barriers on young people seeking sexual and reproductive health services and to examine how point of service evaluations have assessed these factors.

Results: 4544 peer-reviewed publications were screened, of which 95 met the inclusion criteria. To these articles, another 16 grey literature documents were included, resulting in a total of 111 documents included in the review.

Conclusion: Poor privacy and confidentiality practices and provider bias represent significant barriers for young people seeking sexual and reproductive health services across diverse geographic and sociocultural contexts. The authors found that present evaluation methods do not appropriately account for the importance of these factors and that new performance improvement indicators are needed.

Keywords: confidentiality; developing countries; privacy; provider bias; reproductive health services; young people.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Literature selection diagram.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Study countries, including number of studies conducted within each country. (Note: Color shading corresponds to the number of studies conducted within a given country, with darker shading corresponding to a greater number of studies. Some studies were conducted in multiple countries).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sully E., Biddlecom A., Darroch J.E., Riley T., Ashford L.S., Lince-Deroche N., Firestein L., Murro R. Adding It Up: Investing in Sexual Andss Reproductive Health 2019. Guttmacher Institute; New York, NY, USA: 2020. - DOI
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . Sexually Transmitted Disease Surveillance 2014. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; Atlanta, GA, USA: 2015.
    1. Morris J.L., Rushwan H. Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health: The Global Challenges. Int. J. Gynecol. Obstet. 2015;131:S40–S42. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.02.006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Guthold R., Baltag V., Katwan E., Lopez G., Diaz T., Ross D.A. The Top Global Causes of Adolescent Mortality and Morbidity by Age and Sex, 2019. J. Adolesc. Health. 2021;69:540. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2021.06.023. - DOI - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization . Global Health Estimates 2015: Deaths by Cause, Age, Sex, by Country and by Region, 2000–2015. WHO; Geneva, Switzerland: 2015.

LinkOut - more resources