Relationship between Step-by-Step Foot Kinematics and Sprint Performance
- PMID: 35682368
- PMCID: PMC9180722
- DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19116786
Relationship between Step-by-Step Foot Kinematics and Sprint Performance
Abstract
Foot stiffness is a modulator of sprint performance. However, studies that analysed foot angular velocities using inertial measuring units (IMU) for different events within the sprint contact time phase are scarce. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between angular foot step-by-step kinematics and sprint performance during a 50-metre sprint in experienced male and female sprinters. Foot kinematics were measured using IMU devices integrated with a 3-axis gyroscope and a laser gun. The main findings were that men performed faster sprints (6.11 ± 0.35 s vs. 6.77 ± 0.24 s), but the maximal angular foot kinematics were the same between sexes. Maximal angular velocities increased until strides 6-7, where they stabilized. Time from touchdown to maximal dorsiflexion velocity did not change between strides, whereas time from maximal dorsiflexion velocity to toe off decreased until stride 6. Plantarflexion velocities, especially in toe off, showed the greatest associations with sprint times, whereas maximal dorsiflexion velocity presented no association with sprint times. The time from dorsiflexion velocity to toe off from stride 7 onwards determined the sprint performance and was shorter for faster sprinters. The analysis of these variables provides essential information to athletes and coaches that may help to enhance the quality and efficiency of the sprint cycle by giving detailed information on each single stride of the sprint.
Keywords: IMU devices; ankle stiffness; contact time phase; foot angular velocity; sprint time.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures




Similar articles
-
Comparison of development of step-kinematics of assisted 60 m sprints with different pulling forces between experienced male and female sprinters.PLoS One. 2021 Jul 27;16(7):e0255302. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255302. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 34314453 Free PMC article.
-
Step-to-Step Kinematic Validation between an Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) 3D System, a Combined Laser+IMU System and Force Plates during a 50 M Sprint in a Cohort of Sprinters.Sensors (Basel). 2021 Sep 30;21(19):6560. doi: 10.3390/s21196560. Sensors (Basel). 2021. PMID: 34640882 Free PMC article.
-
Estimation of temporal parameters during sprint running using a trunk-mounted inertial measurement unit.J Biomech. 2012 Apr 5;45(6):1123-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.12.020. Epub 2012 Feb 10. J Biomech. 2012. PMID: 22325976 Clinical Trial.
-
Does Site Matter? Impact of Inertial Measurement Unit Placement on the Validity and Reliability of Stride Variables During Running: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Sports Med. 2021 Jul;51(7):1449-1489. doi: 10.1007/s40279-021-01443-8. Epub 2021 Mar 24. Sports Med. 2021. PMID: 33761128
-
The effects of lower limb wearable resistance on sprint running performance: A systematic review.Eur J Sport Sci. 2020 Apr;20(3):394-406. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2019.1629631. Epub 2019 Jul 2. Eur J Sport Sci. 2020. PMID: 31177935
Cited by
-
Evaluating the relationship between negative foot speed and sprint performance using shoe-mounted inertial sensors.PLoS One. 2024 Dec 20;19(12):e0303920. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303920. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 39705282 Free PMC article.
-
Using Inertial Measurement Units to Examine Selected Joint Kinematics in a Road Cycling Sprint: A Series of Single Cases.Sensors (Basel). 2024 May 27;24(11):3453. doi: 10.3390/s24113453. Sensors (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38894244 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources