Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jun 4;11(11):3214.
doi: 10.3390/jcm11113214.

Angle of Uterine Flexion and Adenomyosis

Affiliations

Angle of Uterine Flexion and Adenomyosis

Anjeza Xholli et al. J Clin Med. .

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of adenomyosis in symptomatic women in relation to the angle of flexion of the uterus. A total of 120 patients referring to our Chronic Pelvic Pain Center were prospectively enrolled. Each woman scored menstrual pain, intermenstrual pain, and dyspareunia on a 10 cm visual analogue scale and underwent a clinical examination and transvaginal ultrasound. MUSA criteria were used for the diagnosis of adenomyosis. The angle of flexion of the uterus on the cervix was categorized as <150° (75% of cases), between 150° and 210° (6.7% of cases) and >210° (18.3% of cases). Adenomyosis was diagnosed in 76/120 women (63.3%). In women with adenomyosis, the VAS of intermenstrual pain was higher than in women without adenomyosis (4.04 ± 3.79 vs. 2.57 ± 3.34; p < 0.034). The angle of uterine flexion >210° was more prevalent in women with than without adenomyosis (25.0% vs. 6.8%; p < 0.015). The odds ratio of suffering from adenomyosis markedly increased in the presence of an angle of uterine flexion >210° (OR 5.8 95% CI 1.19, 28.3; p > 0.029). The data indicate that the ultrasound-estimated angle of uterine flexion >210° is related to a higher prevalence of adenomyosis.

Keywords: adenomyosis; chronic pelvic pain; dysmenorrhea; dyspareunia; retroverted uterus; transvaginal ultrasound.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Ultrasonographic and schematic representation of angle of uterine flexion measurement.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Data on prevalence of adenomyosis stratified by the angle uterine flexion in women without and with a diagnosis of adenomyosis. * p = 0.015; ** p = 0.004 vs. control.

References

    1. Struble J., Reid S., Bedaiwy M.A. Adenomyosis: A Clinical Review of a Challenging Gynecologic Condition. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol. 2016;23:164–185. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2015.09.018. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vercellini P., Viganò P., Somigliana E., Daguati R., Abbiati A., Fedele L. Adenomyosis: Epidemiological factors. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2006;20:465–477. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2006.01.017. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Filip G., Balzano A., Cagnacci A. Histological evaluation of the prevalence of adenomyosis, myomas and of their concomitance. Minerva Ginecol. 2019;71:177–181. doi: 10.23736/S0026-4784.18.04291-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Exacoustos C., Zupi E. A new era in diagnosing adenomyosis is coming. Fertil Steril. 2018;110:858. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.07.005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cunningham R.K., Horrow M.M., Smith R.J., Springer J. Adenomyosis: A Sonographic Diagnosis. RadioGraphics. 2018;38:1576–1589. doi: 10.1148/rg.2018180080. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources