Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jun 10;12(1):9575.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-13348-1.

Automated recognition of pain in cats

Affiliations

Automated recognition of pain in cats

Marcelo Feighelstein et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Facial expressions in non-human animals are closely linked to their internal affective states, with the majority of empirical work focusing on facial shape changes associated with pain. However, existing tools for facial expression analysis are prone to human subjectivity and bias, and in many cases also require special expertise and training. This paper presents the first comparative study of two different paths towards automatizing pain recognition in facial images of domestic short haired cats (n = 29), captured during ovariohysterectomy at different time points corresponding to varying intensities of pain. One approach is based on convolutional neural networks (ResNet50), while the other-on machine learning models based on geometric landmarks analysis inspired by species specific Facial Action Coding Systems (i.e. catFACS). Both types of approaches reach comparable accuracy of above 72%, indicating their potential usefulness as a basis for automating cat pain detection from images.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mirror image of cat’s face, depicting placement of the 48 facial landmarks. Landmarks appear contralateral to their origin, as they would when directly observing the cat’s face.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Image before and after alignment.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Landmark transformation into vectors, and division into four regions of interest according to the Felice Grimace Scale.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Preprocessing pipeline for model 1.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Preprocessing pipeline for model 2.

References

    1. Langford DJ, et al. Coding of facial expressions of pain in the laboratory mouse. Nat. Methods. 2010;7:447–449. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1455. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sotocina SG, et al. The rat grimace scale: A partially automated method for quantifying pain in the laboratory rat via facial expressions. Mol. Pain. 2011;7:1744–8069. doi: 10.1186/1744-8069-7-55. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Keating, S. C., Thomas, A. A., Flecknell, P. A. & Leach, M. C. Evaluation of emla cream for preventing pain during tattooing of rabbits: Changes in physiological, behavioural and facial expression responses (2012). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dalla Costa E, et al. Development of the horse grimace scale (hgs) as a pain assessment tool in horses undergoing routine castration. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e92281. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092281. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Di Giminiani P, et al. The assessment of facial expressions in piglets undergoing tail docking and castration: Toward the development of the piglet grimace scale. Front. Vet. Sci. 2016;3:100. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2016.00100. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types