Dyspnea and the electromyographic activity of inspiratory muscles during weaning from mechanical ventilation
- PMID: 35688999
- PMCID: PMC9187801
- DOI: 10.1186/s13613-022-01025-5
Dyspnea and the electromyographic activity of inspiratory muscles during weaning from mechanical ventilation
Abstract
Rationale: Dyspnea, a key symptom of acute respiratory failure, is not among the criteria for spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) failure. Here, we sought (1) to determine whether dyspnea is a reliable failure criterion for SBT failure; (2) to quantify the relationship between dyspnea and the respective electromyographic activity of the diaphragm (EMGdi), the parasternal (EMGpa) and the Alae nasi (EMGan).
Methods: Mechanically ventilated patients undergoing an SBT were included. Dyspnea intensity was measured by the Dyspnea-Visual Analogic Scale (Dyspnea-VAS) at the initiation and end of the SBT. During the 30-min SBT or until SBT failure, the EMGdi was continuously measured with a multi-electrode nasogastric catheter and the EMGan and EMGpa with surface electrodes.
Results: Thirty-one patients were included, SAPS 2 (median [interquartile range]) 53 (37‒74), mechanically ventilated for 6 (3‒10) days. Seventeen patients (45%) failed the SBT. The increase in Dyspnea-VAS along the SBT was higher in patients who failed (6 [4‒8] cm) than in those who passed (0 [0‒1] cm, p = 0.01). The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve for Dyspnea-VAS was 0.909 (0.786-1.032). The increase in Dyspnea-VAS was significantly correlated to the increase in EMGan (Rho = 0.42 [0.04‒0.70], p < 0.05), but not to the increase in EMGpa (Rho = - 0.121 [- 0.495 to - 0.290], p = 0.555) and EMGdi (Rho = - 0.26 [- 0.68 to 0.28], p = 0.289).
Conclusion: Dyspnea is a reliable criterion of SBT failure, suggesting that Dyspnea-VAS could be used as a monitoring tool of the SBT. In addition, dyspnea seems to be more closely related to the electromyographic activity of the Alae nasi than of the diaphragm.
Keywords: Clinical study; Dyspnea; Mechanical ventilation; Physiology.
© 2022. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Dr. Alexandre Demoule reports personal fees from Medtronic, grants, personal fees and non-financial support from Philips, personal fees from Baxter, personal fees from Hamilton, personal fees and non-financial support from Fisher & Paykel, grants from the French Ministry of Health, personal fees from Getinge, grants and personal fees from Respinor, grants and non-financial support from Lungpacer, unrelated to the work submitted. Dr. Thomas Similowski reports, over the last 3 years, (1) personal fees from ADEP assistance, AstraZeneca France, Boehringer Ingelheim France, Chiesi France, Lungpacer Inc., Novartis France, and Vitalaire; and (2) as a member of the board of a research association, unrestricted grants from Covidien, Lungpacer, Maquet, and Philips, all unrelated to the present work. Dr. Similowski is listed as inventor on issued patents (WO2008006963A3, WO2012004534A1, WO2013164462A1) describing EEG responses to experimental and clinical dyspnea to identify and alleviate dyspnea in non-communicative patients. Dr. Côme Bureau reports personal fees from Meditor and Otsuka all unrelated to the present work. Dr. Martin Dres reports over the last three years personal fees from Lungpacer Inc., congress registration from Dräger and Research Contract with Bioserenity. Dr. Elise Morawiec, Dr. Julien Mayaux, Dr. Julie Delemazure have no competing interests related to this work.
Figures


References
-
- Subirà C, Hernández G, Vázquez A, Rodríguez-García R, González-Castro A, García C, et al. Effect of pressure support vs t-piece ventilation strategies during spontaneous breathing trials on successful extubation among patients receiving mechanical ventilation: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2019;321(22):2175–2182. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.7234. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources