Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology consensus on fertility-sparing surgery for cervical cancer
- PMID: 35689582
- DOI: 10.1002/jso.26899
Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology consensus on fertility-sparing surgery for cervical cancer
Abstract
Objective: Several controversies remain on conservative management of cervical cancer. Our aim was to develop a consensus recommendation on important and novel topics of fertility-sparing treatment of cervical cancer.
Methods: The consensus was sponsored by the Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology (BSSO) from March 2020 to September 2020 and included a multidisciplinary team of 55 specialists. A total of 21 questions were addressed and they were assigned to specialists' groups that reviewed the literature and drafted preliminary recommendations. Further, the coordinators evaluated the recommendations that were classified by the level of evidence, and finally, they were voted by all participants.
Results: The questions included controversial topics on tumor assessment, surgical treatment, and surveillance in conservative management of cervical cancer. The two topics with lower agreement rates were the role of minimally invasive approach in radical trachelectomy and parametrial preservation. Additionally, only three recommendations had <90% of agreement (fertility preservation in Stage Ib2, anti-stenosis device, and uterine transposition).
Conclusions: As very few clinical trials have been developed in surgery for cervical cancer, most recommendations were supported by low levels of evidence. We addressed important and novel topics in conservative management of cervical cancer and our study may contribute to literature.
Keywords: cervical cancer; conservative management; fertility-sparing surgery; radical trachelectomy; simple trachelectomy.
© 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Bray F, Ferlay J, I. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA. 2018;71:209-249. doi:10.3322/caac.21492
-
- Instituto Nacional de Câncer, Brasil - Estimativa dos casos novos. (2019). Accessed December 30, 2021. https://www.inca.gov.br/estimativa/estado-capital/brasil#main-content
-
- Machida H, Mandelbaum RS, Mikami M, et al. Characteristics and outcomes of reproductive-aged women with early-stage cervical cancer: trachelectomy vs hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;219:461.e1-461.e18. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2018.08.020
-
- Smith ES, Moon AS, OʼHanlon R, et al. Radical trachelectomy for the treatment of early-stage cervical cancer: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol. 2020;136:533-542. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000003952
-
- Segarra-Vidal B, Persson J, Falconer H. Radical trachelectomy. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2021;31:1068-1074. doi:10.1136/ijgc-2020-001782
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials