Prolapse and mesh reoperations following sacrocolpopexy: comparing supracervical hysterectomy, total hysterectomy, and no hysterectomy
- PMID: 35689689
- DOI: 10.1007/s00192-022-05263-w
Prolapse and mesh reoperations following sacrocolpopexy: comparing supracervical hysterectomy, total hysterectomy, and no hysterectomy
Abstract
Introduction and hypothesis: Sacrocolpopexy is effective for apical prolapse repair and is often performed with hysterectomy. It is unknown whether supracervical or total hysterectomy at time of sacrocolpopexy influences prolapse recurrence and mesh complications. The primary objective of this study is to compare reoperations for recurrent prolapse after sacrocolpopexy with either supracervical hysterectomy or total hysterectomy, or without concomitant hysterectomy. We also sought to compare these three groups for the incidence of mesh complications and describe cervical interventions following supracervical hysterectomy.
Methods: A retrospective cohort study of sacrocolpopexy was performed using the MarketScan® Research Database. Women > 18 years who underwent sacrocolpopexy between 2010 to 2014 were identified. Utilizing diagnostic and procedural codes, reoperations for prolapse and mesh complications were identified. Women with < 2 years of follow-up were excluded.
Results: From 2010 to 2014, 3463 women underwent sacrocolpopexy with at least 2 years of follow-up, 910 (26.3%) with supracervical hysterectomy, 1243 (35.9%) with total hysterectomy, and 1310 (37.8%) without hysterectomy. Reoperations for prolapse were similar after supracervical hysterectomy (1.5%), after total hysterectomy (1.1%, p = 0.40), and without hysterectomy (1.5%, p = 0.98). Mesh complications after sacrocolpopexy were similar after supracervical hysterectomy (1.8%), after total hysterectomy (1.5%, p = 0.68), and without hysterectomy (2.8%, p = 0.11). Following supracervical hysterectomy, 0.9% underwent cervical procedures.
Conclusions: When comparing supracervical and total hysterectomy at time of sacrocolpopexy, there were no significant differences in reoperations for recurrent prolapse, reoperations for mesh complications, or mesh complication diagnoses. This study shows that surgeons can be reassured on performing hysterectomy with sacrocolpopexy.
Keywords: Mesh erosion; Mesh exposure; Pelvic organ prolapse; Recurrence, sacrocolpopexy.
© 2022. This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply.
Similar articles
-
Risk of postoperative mesh exposure following sacrocolpopexy with supracervical versus total concomitant laparoscopic hysterectomy.Int Urogynecol J. 2024 Jan;35(1):207-213. doi: 10.1007/s00192-023-05658-3. Epub 2023 Dec 7. Int Urogynecol J. 2024. PMID: 38060029
-
Assessing the Impact of Vaginal Hysterectomy with Vaginal Mesh Attachment on Outcomes and Complications during Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2023 Jan;30(1):25-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2022.09.556. Epub 2022 Oct 9. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2023. PMID: 36223863
-
Rate of Mesh Erosion After Sacrocolpopexy With Concurrent Supracervical Compared With Total Hysterectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Sep 1;140(3):412-420. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004901. Epub 2022 Aug 3. Obstet Gynecol. 2022. PMID: 35926201
-
Clinical outcomes and complications of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with versus without concomitant hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse in Hong Kong Chinese patients after median follow-up of 7 years.Int Urogynecol J. 2023 Jan;34(1):271-278. doi: 10.1007/s00192-022-05403-2. Epub 2022 Nov 17. Int Urogynecol J. 2023. PMID: 36394632
-
Uterine preservation vs hysterectomy in pelvic organ prolapse surgery: a systematic review with meta-analysis and clinical practice guidelines.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Aug;219(2):129-146.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.01.018. Epub 2018 Jan 17. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018. PMID: 29353031
Cited by
-
Composite Failure Associated With Sacrohysteropexy and Sacrocolpopexy With Supracervical Hysterectomy for Advanced Pelvic Organ Prolapse.Neurourol Urodyn. 2025 Feb;44(2):434-442. doi: 10.1002/nau.25640. Epub 2024 Dec 20. Neurourol Urodyn. 2025. PMID: 39704264 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Boyles SH, Weber AM, Meyn L. Procedures for pelvic organ prolapse in the United States, 1979-1997. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;188(1):108. - DOI
-
- Wu JM, Kawasaki A, Hundley AF, et al. Predicting the number of women who will undergo incontinence and prolapse surgery, 2010 to 2050. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;205(3):230.e1–5. - DOI
-
- Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, Schmid C. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;4:004014.
-
- Costantini E, Brubaker L, Cervigni M, et al. Sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: evidence-based review and recommendations. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016;205:60–5. - DOI
-
- Osmundsen BC, Clark A, Goldsmith C, Adams K, Denman MA, Edwards R, et al. Mesh erosion in robotic sacrocolpopexy. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2012;18(2):86–8. - DOI
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical