Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jun 11;18(1):48.
doi: 10.1186/s13223-022-00690-2.

Clarifying SABA overuse: Translating Canadian Thoracic Society guidelines into clinical practice

Affiliations

Clarifying SABA overuse: Translating Canadian Thoracic Society guidelines into clinical practice

Anne K Ellis et al. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. .

Abstract

Patients with asthma frequently over rely on short-acting beta-agonists (SABA) to treat acute symptoms. This can adversely impact quality of life and increase the risk of exacerbations. SABA overuse is also associated with an increased risk of mortality. In their 2021 update on the diagnosis and management of mild asthma, the Canadian Thoracic Society (CTS) newly recommended that a combination inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) and long-acting beta-agonist, specifically budesonide/formoterol, may be used as-needed (PRN) as an alternative reliever to SABA. The CTS developed an algorithm as a guide for deciding for whom PRN budesonide/formoterol versus PRN SABA is appropriate as a reliever. While the CTS algorithm provides necessary and precise guidance, the somewhat complicated requirements for determining control and exacerbation risk may still end up leaving some patients at-risk of SABA overreliance. This communication simplifies the reliever decision algorithm developed by the CTS for application in daily practice. A 30-s evaluation of 2 simple questions related to reliever use can usually accurately assess if a patient's asthma is controlled: How many SABA canisters do you use a year AND how many times do you use SABA a week? If the patient indicates use of > 2 SABA canisters per year or > 2 administrations of SABA per week for any reason, the patient does not have controlled asthma and PRN SABA is not an appropriate treatment regimen. Similarly, for patients using PRN ICS/formoterol, more than 2 administrations per week indicates a clinical review and reevaluation of their management, including augmentation. An education process is essential to inform patients, caregivers, and healthcare providers that overuse of any reliever is not acceptable and is potentially harmful.

Keywords: Asthma; Controlled; Overreliance; Overuse; Rescue; Short-acting beta agonist; Uncontrolled.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

A.K. Ellis has participated in advisory boards for ALK-Abelló, AstraZeneca, Bausch Health, Circassia Ltd, GlaxoSmithKline, LEO Pharma, Johnson & Johnson, Merck, Mylan, Novartis, Pediapharm and Pfizer, has been a speaker for ALK, AstraZeneca, Bausch Health, Boehringer-Ingelheim, CACME, Meda, Medexus, Miravo, Mylan, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, The ACADEMY, and Takeda. Her institution has received research grants from AstraZeneca, Bayer, LLC, Circassia Ltd, Green Cross Pharmaceuticals, GlaxoSmithKline, Sun Pharma, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron and Sanofi. She has also served as an independent consultant to Allergy Therapeutics, Bayer, LLC, Ora Inc., and Regeneron in the past. V. Foran participates on advisory boards for GlaxoSmithKline, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, and Asthma Canada, has received educational grants from GlaxoSmithKline, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Sanofi Genzyme, Sanofi Pasteur, and Novartis. A. Kaplan has served on advisory Boards or Speakers Bureaus for AstraZeneca, Behring, Boehringer- Ingelheim, Cipla, Covis, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer Sanofi, Teva, Trudel, and Valeo. P.D. Mitchell has participated in advisory boards for AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi and has received grant support from Teva in the past.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Reliever selection for patients with very mild or mild asthma. Higher exacerbation risk and poorly controlled asthma as defined by the Canadian Thoracic Society [9]. As-needed (PRN) short-acting beta-agonist (SABA) should be reserved only for patients with very mild or mild asthma who are not over-reliant on SABA, whose asthma is well-controlled on SABA alone, and who are not at higher risk for exacerbation. ED, emergency department; FEV1 forced expiratory volume in 1 s, ICS inhaled corticosteroid, PEF peak expiratory flow
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Reliever reliance test. [11] Reproduced with permission from Prof. Rob Horne.

References

    1. GINA . Global strategy for asthma management and prevention. 2018.
    1. O'Byrne PM, Jenkins C, Bateman ED. The paradoxes of asthma management: time for a new approach? Eur Respir J. 2017;50:1701103. doi: 10.1183/13993003.01103-2017. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cole S, Seale C, Griffiths C. The blue one takes a battering' why do young adults with asthma overuse bronchodilator inhalers? A qualitative study. BMJ Open. 2013;3:e002247. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002247. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Blakeston S, Harper G, Zabala MJ. Identifying the drivers of patients' reliance on short-acting β2-agonists in asthma. J Asthma. 2021;58:1094–1101. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2020.1761382. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Spitzer WO, Suissa S, Ernst P, et al. The use of beta-agonists and the risk of death and near death from asthma. N Engl J Med. 1992;326:501–506. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199202203260801. - DOI - PubMed