Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2022 Sep;111(3):256-266.
doi: 10.1007/s00223-022-00991-z. Epub 2022 Jun 12.

High-Intensity Exercise and Geometric Indices of Hip Bone Strength in Postmenopausal Women on or off Bone Medication: The MEDEX-OP Randomised Controlled Trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

High-Intensity Exercise and Geometric Indices of Hip Bone Strength in Postmenopausal Women on or off Bone Medication: The MEDEX-OP Randomised Controlled Trial

Melanie Kistler-Fischbacher et al. Calcif Tissue Int. 2022 Sep.

Abstract

To compare the effects of high-intensity resistance and impact training (HiRIT) to low-intensity, Pilates-based exercise (LiPBE) on proximal femur geometry and explore the influence of antiresorptive medication on those effects. Postmenopausal women with low bone mass, on or off antiresorptive bone medications were randomly allocated, stratified on medication intake, to eight months of twice-weekly, supervised HiRIT (Onero™) or LiPBE (Buff Bones®). 3D hip software was used to analyse proximal femur DXA scans. Outcomes included femoral neck (FN) and total hip (TH), volumetric (e.g. vBMC, vBMD) and geometric (e.g. cortical thickness, cross-sectional area [CSA], section modulus [Z]) indices of bone strength. Data were analysed using analysis of variance. Scans of 102 women were examined: LiPBE, 43; HiRIT, 37; LiPBE-med, 11; HiRIT-med, 11. HiRIT improved TH trabecular vBMC and vBMD (3.1 ± 1.1% versus - 1.2 ± 1.2%, p = 0.008; and 1.5 ± 1.0% versus - 1.6 ± 1.2%, p = 0.042, respectively) and FN and TH total vBMC (2.0 ± 0.8% versus - 0.2 ± 0.7%, p = 0.032; and 0.7 ± 0.4% versus - 0.8 ± 0.6%, p = 0.032, respectively), compared to losses in LiPBE. HiRIT also increased Z while LiPBE did not (p = 0.035). The combination of HiRIT and medication achieved greater improvements in FN total and trabecular vBMD, total BMC, CSA and Z than HiRIT alone. HiRIT improved geometric parameters of proximal femur strength, while LiPBE exercise was largely ineffective. Medication may enhance some HiRIT effects. Findings suggest reduced hip fracture risk in response to HiRIT.Trial registration number ACTRN12617001511325.

Keywords: Antiresorptive medication; Bone structure; Exercise; Hip fracture; Osteoporosis; Postmenopausal women.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

BRB is the director of The Bone Clinic, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. MK-F, JSY and BKW declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Eight-month percent change (mean ± SE) from exploratory subgroup analyses in femoral neck and total hip vBMC (a) and (b) and volume (c) and (d). ITT data; LiPBE n = 43, LiPBE-med n = 11, HiRIT = 37, HiRIT-med n = 11. * Indicates within-group change from baseline from RMANCOVA (p ≤ 0.05); FN femoral neck, HiRIT high-intensity resistance and impact training, HiRIT-med high-intensity resistance and impact training plus bone medications, ITT intention-to-treat, LiPBE low-intensity Pilates-based exercise, LiPBE-med low-intensity Pilates-based exercise plus bone medications, TH total hip, vBMC volumetric bone mineral content
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Eight-month percent change (mean ± SE) from exploratory subgroup analyses in femoral neck geometric (a) and cross-sectional (b) outcomes. ITT data; LiPBE n = 43, LiPBE-med n = 11, HiRIT = 37, HiRIT-med n = 11. * Indicates within-group change from baseline from RMANCOVA (p ≤ 0.05); CSA cross-sectional area, CSMI cross-sectional moment of inertia, HiRIT high-intensity resistance and impact training, HiRIT-med high-intensity resistance and impact training plus bone medications, ITT intention-to-treat, LiPBE low-intensity Pilates-based exercise, LiPBE-med low-intensity Pilates-based exercise plus bone medications, Z section modulus

References

    1. (1994) Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Report of a WHO Study Group. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 843:1-129 - PubMed
    1. Hillier TA, Stone KL, Bauer DC, Rizzo JH, Pedula KL, Cauley JA, et al. Evaluating the value of repeat bone mineral density measurement and prediction of fractures in older women: the study of osteoporotic fractures. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167:155–160. doi: 10.1001/archinte.167.2.155. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chapurlat R, Bui M, Sornay-Rendu E, Zebaze R, Delmas PD, Liew D, et al. Deterioration of cortical and trabecular microstructure identifies women with osteopenia or normal bone mineral density at imminent and long-term risk for fragility fracture: a prospective study. J Bone Miner Res. 2020;35:833–844. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.3924. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Samelson EJ, Broe KE, Xu H, Yang L, Boyd S, Biver E, et al. Cortical and trabecular bone microarchitecture as an independent predictor of incident fracture risk in older women and men in the Bone Microarchitecture International Consortium (BoMIC): a prospective study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2019;7:34–43. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(18)30308-5. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ammann P, Rizzoli R. Bone strength and its determinants. Osteoporos Int. 2003;14:13–18. doi: 10.1007/s00198-002-1345-4. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources