Comparison of the cyclic fatigue resistance of One Curve, F6 Skytaper, Protaper Next, and Hyflex CM endodontic files
- PMID: 35692224
- PMCID: PMC9160766
- DOI: 10.5395/rde.2022.47.e16
Comparison of the cyclic fatigue resistance of One Curve, F6 Skytaper, Protaper Next, and Hyflex CM endodontic files
Abstract
Objectives: This study compared the cyclic fatigue resistance of One Curve (C wire) and F6 Skytaper (conventional austenite nickel-titanium [NiTi]), and 2 instruments with thermo-mechanically treated NiTi: Protaper Next X2 (M wire) and Hyflex CM (CM wire).
Materials and methods: Ten new instruments of each group (size: 0.25 mm, 6% taper in the 3 mm tip region) were tested using a rotary bending machine with a 60° curvature angle and a 5 mm curvature radius, at room temperature. The number of cycles until fracture was recorded. The length of the fractured instruments was measured. The fracture surface of each fragment was examined with a scanning electron microscope (SEM). The data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance and the post hoc Tukey test. The significance level was set at 0.05.
Results: At 60°, One Curve, F6 Skytaper and Hyflex CM had significantly longer fatigue lives than Protaper Next X2 (p < 0.05). No statistically significant differences were found in the cyclic fatigue lives of One Curve, F6 Skytaper, and Hyflex CM (p > 0.05). SEM images of the fracture surfaces of the different instruments showed typical features of fatigue failure.
Conclusions: Within the conditions of this study, at 60° and with a 5 mm curvature radius, the cyclic fatigue life of One Curve was not significantly different from those of F6 Skytaper and Hyflex CM. The cyclic fatigue lives of these 3 instruments were statistically significantly longer than that of Protaper Next.
Keywords: Cyclic fatigue; Endodontics; Nickel-titanium alloy; Rotary files; Scanning electron microscopy.
Copyright © 2022. The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of Interest: No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
Figures


References
-
- Neurohr AJ, Dunand DC. Shape-memory NiTi with two-dimensional networks of micro-channels. Acta Biomater. 2011;7:1862–1872. - PubMed
-
- Frotscher M, Kahleyss F, Simon T, Biermann D, Eggeler G. Achieving small structures in thin NiTi sheets for medical applications with water jet and micro machining: a comparison. J Mater Eng Perform. 2011;20:776–782.
-
- Stoeckel D. Nitinol medical devices and implants. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2000;9:81–88. - PubMed
-
- Oshida Y. Bioscience and bioengineering of titanium materials. 1st ed. Amsterdam, Holland: Elsevier; 2007.
-
- Thompson SA. An overview of nickel-titanium alloys used in dentistry. Int Endod J. 2000;33:297–310. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources