Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 May 26:10:867397.
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.867397. eCollection 2022.

Patient- and Community-Oriented Primary Care Approaches for Health in Rural, Remote and Resource-Dependent Places: Insights for Eco-Social Praxis

Affiliations
Review

Patient- and Community-Oriented Primary Care Approaches for Health in Rural, Remote and Resource-Dependent Places: Insights for Eco-Social Praxis

Chris G Buse et al. Front Public Health. .

Abstract

Accelerating ecological and societal changes require re-imagining the role of primary care and public health to address eco-social concerns in rural and remote places. In this narrative review, we searched literatures on: community-oriented primary care, patient-oriented research engagement, public health and primary care synergies, and primary care addressing social determinants of health. Our analysis was guided by questions oriented to utility for addressing concerns of social-ecological systems in rural, remote contexts characterized by a high degree of reliance on resource extraction and development (e.g., forestry, mining, oil and gas, fisheries, agriculture, ranching and/or renewables). We describe a range of useful frameworks, processes and tools that are oriented toward bolstering the resilience and engagement of both primary care and public health, though few explicitly incorporated considerations of eco-social approaches to health or broader eco-social context(s). In synthesizing the existing evidence base for integration between primary care and public health, the results signal that for community-oriented primary care and related frameworks to be useful in rural and remote community settings, practitioners are required to grapple with complexity, durable relationships, sustainable resources, holistic approaches to clinician training, Indigenous perspectives, and governance.

Keywords: community engagement; patient engagement; primary care; public health; resource development; rural health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Extending clinical competencies to support the treatment of “communities as patients” in rural and remote places.

References

    1. Bourke L, Humphreys JS, Wakerman J, Taylor J. Understanding rural and remote health: a framework for analysis in Australia. Health Place. (2012) 18:496–503. 10.1016/j.healthplace.2012.02.009 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bourke L, Humphreys JS, Wakerman J, Taylor J. Charting the future course of rural health and remote health in Australia: why we need theory. Aust J Rural Health. (2010) 18:54–8. 10.1111/j.1440-1584.2010.01125.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Williams AM, Cutchin MP. The rural context of health care provision. J Interprof Care. (2002) 16:107–15. 10.1080/13561820220124120 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Strasser R, Neusy AJ. Context counts: training health workers in and for rural and remote areas. Bull World Health Organ. (2010) 88:777–82. 10.2471/BLT.09.072462 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hanlon N. Environments of health and care: the contributions of political economy. In: Crooks V, Andrews G, Pearce J, editors. Handbook of Health Geography. London; New York, NY: Routledge; (2018). pp. 88–93.

Publication types

Grants and funding