Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1987;56(3):323-30.
doi: 10.1007/BF00690900.

Validation of a simple mechanical accelerometer (pedometer) for the estimation of walking activity

Comparative Study

Validation of a simple mechanical accelerometer (pedometer) for the estimation of walking activity

E J Bassey et al. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1987.

Abstract

A small (28 g) mechanical accelerometer has been tested by subjecting it to controlled bench tests consisting of repetitive vertical oscillations on two designs of test rig. The accelerometer's 3-digit display provided a cumulated score with a maximum of 99.9 units. This score was compared with an independent count of the imposed oscillations and found to be linear with time (r = 0.996) and reproducible on retest (coefficient of variation = +/- 1.5%). The sensitivity ranged from 6.2 to 7.4 units/10,000 oscillations. The response was related to the maximal applied acceleration (calculated from the amplitude and frequency of the oscillations on the assumption that they were sinusoidal) and independent of the amplitude and frequency used. The threshold maximal acceleration was less than 2 m s-2 and the response had reached a plateau at 4 m s-2. During field studies the accelerometer was firmly attached over the hip in a waistband where it responded to the vertical accelerations produced by walking. When compared with an independent count of footsteps from a heel-mounted resistance pad the accelerometer score (after calibration) was not significantly different. The mean difference was (0.29 +/- 0.67, S.D.) 10(3) "steps" in a younger group (n = 8, mean age 39 years) and (0.46 +/- 1.08, S.D.) 10(3) "steps" in an older group of women (n = 6, mean age 65 years). Scores of around 10 X 10(3) "steps" can be expected in a day in moderately active young subjects and 40 X 10(3) "steps" in a week in the elderly. Simultaneously recorded scores from both right and left hips wee not significantly different.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Q J Exp Physiol. 1986 Jan;71(1):47-58 - PubMed
    1. Res Q. 1977 Oct;48(3):632-6 - PubMed
    1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1915 Dec;1(12):597-600 - PubMed
    1. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1977 Oct 31;37(3):219-28 - PubMed
    1. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1986;54(6):585-90 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources